Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Pathol Transl Med > Volume 53(2); 2019 > Article
Original Article
 Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Coexpression Is an Independent Poor Prognostic Factor in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
Yeon Bi Han1orcid, Hyun Jung Kwon1orcid, Soo Young Park1orcid, Eun-Sun Kim1orcid, Hyojin Kim1orcid, Jin-Haeng Chung,1,2orcid
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2019;53(2):86-93.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2018.12.26
Published online: January 14, 2019

1Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

2Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding Author Jin-Haeng Chung, MD, PhD Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea Tel: +82-31-787-7713 Fax: +82-31-787-4012 E-mail: chungjh@snu.ac.kr
• Received: July 20, 2018   • Revised: December 1, 2018   • Accepted: December 26, 2018

© 2019 The Korean Society of Pathologists/The Korean Society for Cytopathology

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • 7,541 Views
  • 136 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
  • 4 Scopus
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • Background
    Both human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) molecules are known to play important roles in cancer immunity. In this study, we evaluated HLA class I expression in resected adenocarcinoma of the lung, and investigated its prognostic impact in correlation with PD-L1 expression.
  • Methods
    HLA class I and PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in a total of 403 resected lung adenocarcinomas using tissue microarray. Correlations between the expression of HLA class I/PD-L1 and clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance were analyzed.
  • Results
    HLA class I expression was reduced in 91.6% of adenocarcinoma, and more frequently reduced in patients with younger age, absence of vascular invasion, and low pathologic stage (p = .033, p = .007, and p = .012, respectively). Positive PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was 16.1% (1% cut-off), and associated with poor differentiation, presence of vascular invasion and nodal metastasis (p < .001, p = .002, and p = .032, respectively). On survival analysis, HLA class I or PD-L1 expression alone did not show any statistical significance. On the integrated analysis, HLA class I (+)/PD-L1 (+) subgroup showed a significantly shorter overall survival than other groups (p = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that coexpression of HLA class I and PD-L1 was an independent poor prognostic factor of lung adenocarcinoma. (p < .001; hazard ratio, 6.106; 95% confidence interval, 2.260 to 16.501).
  • Conclusions
    Lung adenocarcinoma with coexpression of HLA class I and PD-L1 was associated with poor prognosis. This subgroup may evade immune attack by expressing PD-L1 protein despite HLA expression.
  • Keywords: Human leukocyte antigen class I; Programmed cell death-ligand 1; Carcinoma, non-small cell lung; Immunohistochemistry
Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite many advances in targeted therapy based on molecular testing [1], the 5-year overall survival (OS) for advanced lung cancer still remains dismal [2]. Recently, there has been a remarkable progress in immunotherapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunotherapy with antibodies blocking immune checkpoints, including anti–programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), showed durable tumor regression in advanced NSCLCs [3]. Although PD-L1 expression has emerged as a useful biomarker capable of predicting which patients are more likely to respond to anti–programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 therapy, PD-L1 expression is not an absolute predictive marker of clinical response. These findings have intrigued researchers to characterize the host’s immune response against tumor, as well as tumor’s ability to escape the immune attack.
In lung cancer, cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) that play a main role in the anticancer response are actively suppressed in tumor environment [4]. Two major mechanisms, which affect the target cells and the effector phase of the immune response, play a crucial role in the immune editing process. One is represented by the down-regulation of tumor antigen processing and presentation caused by abnormalities in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I antigen processing machinery (APM) [5]. The other is represented by the anergy of effecter immune cell infiltrates in the tumor microenvironment caused by aberrant inhibitory signals such as immune checkpoint receptor ligands, PD-L1 [5]. These two mechanisms, the expression of PD-L1 and the down-regulation of HLA class I by tumor cells, are also crucial factors for the tumor development process.
Although defects in HLA class I APM components are known to be associated with a reduced OS in various types of cancer [6], the prognostic value of HLA class I expression in NSCLC is still controversial [7-9]. Only limited data are available on the correlation between the expression of PD-L1 and HLA-I in NSCLC [7].
To better understand the importance of the PD-L1 and HLA class I expression in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), we investigated their expression in lung ADC by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and correlated with clinicopathologic features including progression-free survival (PFS) and OS.
Patients and samples
Our cohort consisted of 403 patients with lung ADC who underwent curatively intended surgical resection between May 2003 and December 2012 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. None received preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Clinico-pathological information was obtained from electronic medical records and pathology reports. The pathologic staging was based on the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual [10]. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (B-1704/393-303). Informed consent was waived.
Construction of tissue microarray
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained slides were reviewed in each case to confirm the original diagnosis and classify the histologic subtype according to 2015 World Health Organization criteria [11]. The slides were independently reviewed by two pathologists (H. Kim and J.H. Chung) to select the most representative sections. The most representative tumor area was carefully marked on the H&E-stained slide of each sample tissue. A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed using 2-mm diameter cores derived from the representative tumor areas selected at random of the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from each case by SuperBioChips Laboratories (Seoul, Korea).
Immunohistochemical analysis
TMAs were sectioned at a thickness of 4-μm and stained using an anti-HLA class I ABC antibody (EMR8-5, ab70328, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Briefly, the slides were stained with an anti-HLA class I ABC (EMR8-5) mouse monoclonal antibody with Ventana BenchMark XT Staining systems (Tucson, AZ, USA). Expressions of HLA class I was assessed by two pathologists (Y.B. Han and J.H. Chung). The expression level of HLA class I on tumor cells was defined as strongly positive (“retained” expression) when tumor cells for which the membrane was strongly and homogenously stained at the same level as stromal lymphocytes or endothelial cells comprised ≥ 75% of tumor cells (Fig. 1A), weakly positive for 25%–74%, or tumor cells with the membrane stained more weakly than stromal lymphocytes or endothelial cells comprising ≥ 25% (Fig. 1B), and negative when stained cells comprised < 25% (Fig. 1C). Cases with negative or weakly positive staining were judged as representing “reduced” expression.
PD-L1 expression had been evaluated in a previous study with IHC using anti–PD-L1 22C3 mouse monoclonal primary antibody with the EnVision FLEX visualization system on a Dako Autostainer Link 48 system (Carpinteria, CA, USA) [12]. Each tumor cell was judged as positive staining for PD-L1 when the membrane was stained at any intensity. Each patient was classified into “negative” or “positive” according to the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells; two different cut-off values (1% and 50%) used on the basis of the published association of this cutoff with anti–PD-1 therapeutic response (Fig. 1D–F) [13].
Statistical analysis
The chi-square test (or Fisher exact test when appropriate) was used to assess the significance of the association of HLA class I and PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological parameters. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to construct survival curves and statistical significance was assessed using the log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. All statistical tests were two sided and statistical significance was accepted for p-values of < .05. All statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences ver. 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Clinicopathologic characteristics
The clinicopathological features and IHC results of the patients are summarized in Table 1. There was a female predominance in this cohort (52.6%). The mean age of patients was 65 years (range, 23 to 82 years) with 242 never smokers (60%), 89 exsmokers (22.1%), and 72 current smokers (17.9%). Regarding pathologic stage, 234 patients were stage I (58.1%), 83 were stage II (20.6%), and 86 were (21.3%) stage III.
HLA class I and PD-L1 expression
HLA class I expression was observed in the normal bronchial epithelium, type II pneumocytes and other non-neoplastic cells with membranous staining. In the tumor cells, 34 specimens (8.4%) showed strongly positive membranous expression of HLA class I antigen, 120 specimens (29.8%) with weakly positive expression, and 249 specimens (61.8%) with negative expression. Therefore, HLA class I expression was reduced in 369 patients (91.6%) and retained in 34 patients (8.4%). Reduced HLA-class I expression was more frequently seen in younger age, absence of vascular invasion, and low pathologic stage (p = .033, p = .007, and p = .012, respectively). PD-L1 expression was normally expressed in membranes of the alveolar macrophages and some lymphocytes. In the tumor cells, 65 patients (16.1%) with cutoff value of 1% and 23 patients (5.7%) with cutoff value of 50% showed positive PD-L1 expression. Positive PD-L1 expression (1% cutoff) was associated with poor differentiation, presence of vascular invasion and nodal metastasis (p < .001, p = .002, and p = .032, respectively). In addition, positive PD-L1 expression (1% cutoff) was correlated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type tumors (p = .003) (Table 2).
Survival analysis
At the time of analysis, the median PFS was 36.0 months and the median OS was 65.0 months. During this time, 164 patients (40.7%) suffered tumor recurrence and 90 patients (22.3%) died due to cancer. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of HLA class I and PD-L1 protein expression. There was no significant difference in OS according to HLA class I status (5-year survival, 81.4% in ‘‘reduced’’ patients vs. 69.3% in ‘‘retained’’ patients; p = .115) (Fig. 2A).
There was no significant difference in OS according to PD-L1 expression status, either. (Fig. 2B). The 5-year OS of PD-L1–positive and PD-L1–negative patients using each cutoff value was 75.4% and 81.3% (cutoff, 1%; p = .423), 78.7% and 80.5% (cutoff, 50%; p = .534), respectively. However, when both markers were analyzed simultaneously, coexpression of HLA class I and PD-L1 (1% cutoff) group (n = 10) had a significantly shorter OS than other groups (5-year survival, 42.0%; p = .009) (Fig. 2C). When analyzed by PD-L1 expression with stratification by HLA class I status, a significantly poor prognosis in PD-L1–positive patients (1% cutoff) was documented only when HLA class I expression was ‘‘retained” (n = 34, p = .043) (Fig. 3A). Among patients with ‘‘reduced’’ HLA class I expression, PD-L1 expression status provided no prognostic impact (p = .828) (Fig. 3B).
In addition, there was no significant difference in PFS according to HLA class I status and PD-L1 status. Multivariate analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model revealed coexpression of HLA class I and PD-L1 as an independent factor associated with poor prognosis (p < .001; hazard ratio, 6.106; 95% confidence interval, 2.260 to 16.501) (Table 3).
In this study, we evaluated the expression of HLA class 1 and PD-L1 protein in 403 lung ADCs and investigated the relationship between HLA class 1/PD-L1 protein expression and various clinicopathological factors and molecular characteristics. Our study showed that HLA class I expression was reduced in 91.6%, and positive PD-L1 expression was 16.1% (1% cutoff) in surgically resected lung ADC. On survival analysis, HLA class I or PD-L1 expression alone did not showed any statistical significance. On the integrated analysis, HLA class I (+)/PD-L1 (+) subgroup showed a significant shorter OS than other groups (p = .009). Multivariate analysis revealed that coexpression of HLA class I and PD-L1 was an independent poor prognostic factor of lung ADC (p < .001; hazard ratio, 6.106; 95% confidence interval, 2.260 to 16.501).
The frequency of HLA class I antigen reduction in this cohort seemed to be high compared to other studies for NSCLC (43% to 93.6%) [7-9,14]. Hirai et al. [7] reported that reduced HLA class I expression was observed in 43% of the stage I lung ADC, and they used 20% and 80% cutoff. Ramnath et al. [9] reported that reduced HLA class I expression was observed in 93.6% of the NSCLC patients, and they used 25% and 75% cutoff. CTLs can recognize tumor-specific antigens presented on various types of HLA class I molecules on the tumor [15,16]. As the prerequisite of anti-tumor activity of CTLs is the recognition of immunogenic epitopes presented on HLA class I molecules on the tumor cells, reduced expression of HLA class I molecule in lung ADC is not surprising. However, the prognostic impact of HLA class I molecule expression is highly controversial.
High HLA class I expression had been reported to be associated with a better survival in esophageal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer [17-19], or poor prognosis in gastric cancer and colorectal cancer [16,20,21], These contradictory results might be explained by multilateral function of HLA class I molecules. As HLA-B/C molecule has been known to act as an inhibitory receptor against natural killer (NK) cells, cancer cells with loss of HLA class I molecule could be attacked by NK cells [15,16]. The prognostic impact of HLA class I molecule expression could be variable depending on the mechanism of activation of the immune system in each organ. In the present study, there was no significant correlation between HLA class I expression status and survival, which may reflect HLA class I antigen’s diverse roles in immune system.
In this cohort, positive PD-L1 expression was associated with poor differentiation, wild type EGFR, presence of vascular invasion and nodal metastasis, which is consistent with previous reports [7,12,22]. However, there was no significant difference between PD-L1 expressions and survival. Even though neither HLA class I nor PD-L1 alone was associated with the clinical outcome of the patients, integrated analysis of revealed that coexpression of HLA class I and PD-L1 was significantly associated with poor OS. While the patients with PD-L1 (+)/HLA class 1 (+) showed worse prognosis, PD-L1 (+)/HLA class 1 (–) group had no significant prognostic impact.
These results might be explained as below.
(1) The tumor cells with retained HLA class I expression can inhibit NK cells and evade immune system by expressing PD-L1. The immunosurveillance of CD8 T cells may be more critical for patients with high HLA class I expression than for patients who express it at a low level. (2) The tumor cells with reduced HLA class I expression may evade immune attack regardless of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, which may account for the lack of prognostic impact of PD-L1 status. Nevertheless, tumor cells with HLA class I expression can be recognized by CTLs and may evade immune attack by expressing PD-L1, which also may account for the result that PD-L1 positivity was associated with a poor prognosis in tumors with normal HLA class I expression. The exact role of immune mechanism of the HLA class 1 molecule on the pulmonary ADC needs further functional studies. However, we assessed HLA class I status by only anti-HLA class I ABC antibody and the lack of available data concerning clinical response to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy represents a major limitation of our study.
In conclusion, coexpression of HLA class I and PD-L1 was associated with poor prognosis in lung ADC. Because coexpression of HLA class I and PD-L1 was an independent prognostic factor for an extremely poor outcome, postoperative patients with HLA class 1 (+)/PD-L1 (+) should be recommended for short interval follow-up and observation.
This study was supported by Research Grants from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH 14-2018-018), NRF Grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (No.2017R1A5A1015626) and the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI17C1290).
Fig. 1.
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I (A–C) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (D–E) expression in lung adenocarcinoma. (A) Strongly positive (“retained”) staining of HLA class I in tumor cells. (B) Weakly positive staining of HLA class I. (C) Negative staining of HLA class I. (D) ≥50% positive staining of PD-L1 in tumor cells. (E) 1%–49% positive staining of PD-L1. (F) <1% staining of PD-L1.
jptm-2018-12-26f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Association of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I antigen and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) lesions with overall survival in patients. (A) Overall survival curves of patients with lung ADC according to their HLA class I expression. (B) Overall survival curves according to PD-L1 expression status classified by the percentage of tumor cells expressing PD-L1 at the cutoff value of 1%. (C) Overall survival in patients classified by expression of HLA class I and PD-L1. Patients were divided into four groups: HLA class I (–)/PD-L1 (–), HLA class I (–)/PD-L1 (+), HLA class I (+)/PD-L1 (–), HLA class I (+)/PD-L1 (+).
jptm-2018-12-26f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Overall survival according to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression after stratification by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I expression status. (A) Overall survival curves according to PD-L1 expression status (1% cutoff) among “retained” HLA class I cases. (B) Overall survival curves according to PD-L1 expression status (1% cutoff) among “reduced” HLA class I cases.
jptm-2018-12-26f3.jpg
Table 1.
Clinicopathologic characteristics
Characteristic No. (%)
Age (yr)
 Median (range) 65 (23–82)
Sex
 Male 191 (47.4)
 Female 212 (52.6)
Smoking statusa
 Never 242 (60.0)
 Ex-smoker 89 (22.1)
 Current 72 (17.9)
Differentiationb
 Well differentiated 34 (8.4)
 Moderately differentiated 315 (78.2)
 Poorly differentiated 54 (13.4)
Genetic statusc
 EGFR mutant 192 (69.1)
 ALK mutant 20 (7.2)
 KRAS mutant 16 (5.8)
 EGFR(–)/ALK(–)/KRAS(–) 50 (18.0)
Tumor size (cm)
 Mean (range) 31.7 (0.8–16.0)
Pleural invasion
 Absent 235 (58.3)
 Present 168 (41.7)
Venous invasion
 Absent 302 (74.9)
 Present 101 (25.1)
Lymphatic invasion
 Absent 213 (52.9)
 Present 190 (47.1)
Perineural invasion
 Absent 380 (94.3)
 Present 23 (5.7)
Pathologic stage
 IA 127 (31.5)
 IB 107 (26.6)
 IIA 64 (15.9)
 IIB 19 (4.7)
 IIIA 77 (19.1)
 IIIB 9 (2.2)
HLA class I IHC (%)
 < 25 249 (61.8)
 25–74 120 (29.8)
 ≥ 75 34 (8.4)
PD-L1 IHC (%)
 < 1 338 (83.9)
 1–49 42 (10.4)
 ≥ 50 23 (5.7)
Total 403 (100)

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1.

aSmoking status was defined as follows: never smoker (< 100 cigarettes per lifetime); ex-smoker (≥ 100 cigarettes per lifetime and quit > 1 year prior to the diagnosis); current smoker (≥ 100 cigarettes per lifetime and smoked at the time of lung cancer diagnosis or quit ≤ 1 year prior to the diagnosis);

bDifferentiation was defined as follows: well differentiated (lepidic predominant); moderately differentiated (acinar or papillary predominant); poorly differentiated (micropapillary or solid predominant);

cGenetic status was evaluable for 278 patients.

Table 2.
HLA class I, PD-L1 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics
Clinicopathologic feature HLA class I expression
 PD-L1 expression (1% cut-off)
 PD-L1 expression (50% cut-off)
Retained (normal) Reduced (loss) p-value Negative (< 1%) Positive (≥ 1%) p-value Negative (< 50%) Positive (≥ 50%) p-value
Total 34 (8.4) 369 (91.6) 338 (83.9) 65 (16.1) 380 (94.3) 23 (5.7)
Age (yr)
 < 65 11 (5.5) 190 (94.5) .033 174 (86.6) 27 (13.4) .142 191 (95.0) 10 (5.0) .527
 ≥ 65 23 (11.4) 179 (88.6) 164 (81.2) 38 (18.8) 189 (93.6) 13 (6.4)
Sex
 Male 16 (8.4) 175 (91.6) .967 155 (81.2) 36 (18.8) .159 176 (92.1) 15 (7.9) .078
 Female 18 (8.5) 194 (91.5) 183 (86.3) 29 (13.7) 204 (96.2) 8 (3.8)
Smoking status
 Never 19 (7.9) 223 (92.1) .604 206 (85.1) 36 (14.9) .402 231 (95.5) 11 (4.5) .218
 Ex or current 15 (9.3) 146 (90.7) 132 (82.0) 29 (18.0) 149 (92.5) 12 (7.5)
Differentiation
 WD 2 (5.9) 32 (94.1) .422a 34 (100.0) 0 < .001 34 (100) 0 .008a
 MD 25 (7.9) 290 (92.1) 270 (85.7) 45 (14.3) 300 (95.2) 15 (4.8)
 PD 7 (13.0) 47 (87.0) 34 (63.0) 20 (37.0) 46 (85.2) 8 (14.8)
Genetic statusb
 EGFR mutant 17 (8.9) 175 (91.1) .860a 175 (91.1) 17 (8.9) .003 190 (99.0) 2 (1.0) < .001a
 ALK mutant 1 (5.0) 19 (95.0) 17 (85.0) 3 (15.0) 18 (90.0) 2 (10.0)
 KRAS mutant 2 (12.5) 14 (87.5) 10 (62.5) 6 (37.5) 12 (75.0) 4 (25.0)
 EGFR(–)/ALK(–)/KRAS(–) 5 (10.0) 45 (90.0) 39 (78.0) 11 (22.0) 45 (90.0) 5 (10.0)
Pleural invasion
 Negative 19 (8.1) 216 (91.9) .764 199 (84.7) 36 (15.3) .601 224 (95.3) 11 (4.7) .294
 Positive 15 (8.9) 153 (91.1) 139 (82.7) 29 (17.3) 156 (92.9) 12 (7.1)
Vascular invasion
 Negative 19 (6.3) 283 (93.7) .007 263 (87.1) 39 (12.9) .002 289 (95.7) 13 (4.3) .036
 Positive 15 (14.9) 86 (85.1) 75 (74.3) 26 (25.7) 91 (90.1) 10 (9.9)
Lymphatic invasion
 Negative 19 (8.9) 194 (91.1) .712 184 (86.4) 29 (13.6) .146 206 (96.7) 7 (3.3) .027
 Positive 15 (7.9) 175 (92.1) 154 (81.1) 36 (18.9) 174 (91.6) 16 (8.4)
Perineural invasion
 Negative 30 (7.9) 350 (92.1) .118a 321 (84.5) 59 (15.5) .236a 360 (94.7) 20 (5.3) .136a
 Positive 4 (17.4) 19 (82.6) 17 (73.9) 6 (26.1) 20 (87.0) 3 (13.0)
Tumor size (cm)
 ≤ 3 13 (5.4) 229 (94.6) .007 208 (86.0) 34 (14.0) .164 233 (96.3) 9 (3.7) .035
 > 3 21 (13.0) 140 (87.0) 130 (80.7) 31 (19.3) 147 (91.3) 14 (8.7)
N stage
 N0 19 (6.9) 256 (93.1) .106 238 (86.5) 37 (13.5) .032 261 (94.9) 14 (5.1) .434
 ≥ N1 15 (11.7) 113 (88.3) 100 (78.1) 28 (21.9) 119 (93.0) 9 (7.0)
Stage
 I 14 (6.0) 220 (94.0) .012 204 (87.2) 30 (12.8) .079 222 (94.9) 12 (5.1) .484a
 II 6 (7.2) 77 (92.8) 64 (77.1) 19 (22.9) 76 (91.6) 7 (8.4)
 III 14 (16.3) 72 (83.7) 70 (81.4) 16 (18.6) 82 (95.3) 4 (4.7)
Stage I and others
 I 14 (6.0) 220 (94.0) .037 204 (87.2) 30 (12.8) .034 222 (94.9) 12 (5.1) .555
 ≥ IIa 20 (11.8) 149 (88.2) 134 (79.3) 35 (20.7) 158 (93.5) 11 (6.5)
PD-L1 status (1% cutoff)
 Negative 24 (7.1) 314 (92.9) .028
 Positive 10 (15.4) 55 (84.6)

ap-value was obtained by Fisher exact test;

bGenetic status was evaluable for 278 patients.

Table 3.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic factors and overall survival in lung ADC patients
Clinicopathologic variable Univariate
 Multivariate
p-value p-value HR (95% CI)
Age
 < 65 yr vs ≥ 65 yr < .001 < .001 2.871 (1.715–4.804)
Sex
 Male vs female < .001
Smoking Hx
 Never vs ever or current .025 .026 1.774 (1.073–2.935)
Differentiation
 WD vs MD vs PD .077 - -
Genetic status
 EGFR mutant vs ALK mutant vs KRAS mutant vs wild typea .179 - -
Pleural invasion
 Negative vs positive < .001 - -
Vascular invasion
 Negative vs positive .002 - -
Lymphatic invasion
 Negative vs positive < .001 - -
Perineural invasion
 Negative vs positive < .001 - -
Tumor size
 ≤ 3 cm vs > 3 cm < .001 - -
N category
 N0 vs ≥ N1 < .001 .122 2.143 (0.815–5.632)
Stage
 I vs II vs III < .001 .039
 I vs II .294 1.732 (0.621–4.827)
 I vs III .027 3.295 (1.142–9.508)
HLA expression
 < 75% vs ≥ 75% .115 - -
PD-L1 expression
 < 1% vs ≥ 1% .423 - -
HLA(+)/PD-L1(+)
 Others vs double positive .001 < .001 6.106 (2.260–16.501)

ADC, adenocarcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Hx, history; WD, well differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poor differentiated; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1.

aWild type defined as EGFR(–)/ALK(–)/KRAS(–).

  • 1. Shim HS, Choi YL, Kim L, et al. Molecular testing of lung cancers. J Pathol Transl Med 2017; 51: 242-54. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 2. Torre LA, Sauer AM, Chen MS Jr, Kagawa-Singer M, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, 2016: converging incidence in males and females. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 182-202. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 3. Somasundaram A, Burns TF. The next generation of immunotherapy: keeping lung cancer in check. J Hematol Oncol 2017; 10: 87.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 4. Domagala-Kulawik J. The role of the immune system in non-small cell lung carcinoma and potential for therapeutic intervention. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2015; 4: 177-90. PubMedPMC
  • 5. Concha-Benavente F, Srivastava R, Ferrone S, Ferris RL. Immunological and clinical significance of HLA class I antigen processing machinery component defects in malignant cells. Oral Oncol 2016; 58: 52-8. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 6. Campoli M, Ferrone S. HLA antigen changes in malignant cells: epigenetic mechanisms and biologic significance. Oncogene 2008; 27: 5869-85. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 7. Hirai A, Yoneda K, Shimajiri S, et al. Prognostic impact of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in correlation with human leukocyte antigen class I expression status in stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155: 382-92.e1. ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Kikuchi E, Yamazaki K, Torigoe T, et al. HLA class I antigen expression is associated with a favorable prognosis in early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci 2007; 98: 1424-30. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Ramnath N, Tan D, Li Q, et al. Is downregulation of MHC class I antigen expression in human non-small cell lung cancer associated with prolonged survival? Cancer Immunol Immunother 2006; 55: 891-9. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 10. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.PubMed
  • 11. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10: 1243-60. PubMed
  • 12. Kim H, Kwon HJ, Park SY, Park Y, Park E, Chung JH. Clinicopathological analysis and prognostic significance of programmed cell death-ligand 1 protein and mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0198634.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 13. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1540-50. ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Perea F, Sánchez-Palencia A, Gómez-Morales M, et al. HLA class I loss and PD-L1 expression in lung cancer: impact on T-cell infiltration and immune escape. Oncotarget 2018; 9: 4120-33. ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Campbell KS, Purdy AK. Structure/function of human killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors: lessons from polymorphisms, evolution, crystal structures and mutations. Immunology 2011; 132: 315-25. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 16. Ljunggren HG, Kärre K. In search of the 'missing self': MHC molecules and NK cell recognition. Immunol Today 1990; 11: 237-44. ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Imai D, Yoshizumi T, Okano S, et al. The prognostic impact of programmed cell death ligand 1 and human leukocyte antigen class I in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Med 2017; 6: 1614-26. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 18. Mizukami Y, Kono K, Maruyama T, et al. Downregulation of HLA Class I molecules in the tumour is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2008; 99: 1462-7. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 19. Umemoto Y, Okano S, Matsumoto Y, et al. Prognostic impact of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 expression in human leukocyte antigen class I-positive hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy. J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 65-75. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 20. Menon AG, Morreau H, Tollenaar RA, et al. Down-regulation of HLA-A expression correlates with a better prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Lab Invest 2002; 82: 1725-33. ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Ueda Y, Ishikawa K, Shiraishi N, Yokoyama S, Kitano S. Clinical significance of HLA class I heavy chain expression in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2008; 97: 451-5. ArticlePubMed
  • 22. Zhang M, Li G, Wang Y, et al. PD-L1 expression in lung cancer and its correlation with driver mutations: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 10255.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Assessment of cancer cell‐expressed HLA class I molecules and their immunopathological implications
      Terufumi Kubo, Shiori Asano, Kenta Sasaki, Kenji Murata, Takayuki Kanaseki, Tomohide Tsukahara, Yoshihiko Hirohashi, Toshihiko Torigoe
      HLA.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Prognostic and Clinical Significance of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I Expression in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
      Weiqiang Qiao, Zhiqiang Jia, Wanying Guo, Qipeng Liu, Xiao Guo, Miao Deng
      Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.2023; 27(5): 573.     CrossRef
    • Loss of HLA-class-I expression in non-small-cell lung cancer: Association with prognosis and anaerobic metabolism
      Ioannis M. Koukourakis, Alexandra Giatromanolaki, Achilleas Mitrakas, Michael I. Koukourakis
      Cellular Immunology.2022; 373: 104495.     CrossRef

    • PubReader PubReader
    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite this Article
      Cite this Article
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Coexpression Is an Independent Poor Prognostic Factor in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
      J Pathol Transl Med. 2019;53(2):86-93.   Published online January 14, 2019
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2018.12.26
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    • 1
    • 2
    Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Coexpression Is an Independent Poor Prognostic Factor in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
    Image Image Image
    Fig. 1. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I (A–C) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (D–E) expression in lung adenocarcinoma. (A) Strongly positive (“retained”) staining of HLA class I in tumor cells. (B) Weakly positive staining of HLA class I. (C) Negative staining of HLA class I. (D) ≥50% positive staining of PD-L1 in tumor cells. (E) 1%–49% positive staining of PD-L1. (F) <1% staining of PD-L1.
    Fig. 2. Association of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I antigen and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) lesions with overall survival in patients. (A) Overall survival curves of patients with lung ADC according to their HLA class I expression. (B) Overall survival curves according to PD-L1 expression status classified by the percentage of tumor cells expressing PD-L1 at the cutoff value of 1%. (C) Overall survival in patients classified by expression of HLA class I and PD-L1. Patients were divided into four groups: HLA class I (–)/PD-L1 (–), HLA class I (–)/PD-L1 (+), HLA class I (+)/PD-L1 (–), HLA class I (+)/PD-L1 (+).
    Fig. 3. Overall survival according to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression after stratification by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I expression status. (A) Overall survival curves according to PD-L1 expression status (1% cutoff) among “retained” HLA class I cases. (B) Overall survival curves according to PD-L1 expression status (1% cutoff) among “reduced” HLA class I cases.

    Fig. 1.

    Fig. 2.

    Fig. 3.

    Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Coexpression Is an Independent Poor Prognostic Factor in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
    Characteristic No. (%)
    Age (yr)
     Median (range) 65 (23–82)
    Sex
     Male 191 (47.4)
     Female 212 (52.6)
    Smoking statusa
     Never 242 (60.0)
     Ex-smoker 89 (22.1)
     Current 72 (17.9)
    Differentiationb
     Well differentiated 34 (8.4)
     Moderately differentiated 315 (78.2)
     Poorly differentiated 54 (13.4)
    Genetic statusc
     EGFR mutant 192 (69.1)
     ALK mutant 20 (7.2)
     KRAS mutant 16 (5.8)
     EGFR(–)/ALK(–)/KRAS(–) 50 (18.0)
    Tumor size (cm)
     Mean (range) 31.7 (0.8–16.0)
    Pleural invasion
     Absent 235 (58.3)
     Present 168 (41.7)
    Venous invasion
     Absent 302 (74.9)
     Present 101 (25.1)
    Lymphatic invasion
     Absent 213 (52.9)
     Present 190 (47.1)
    Perineural invasion
     Absent 380 (94.3)
     Present 23 (5.7)
    Pathologic stage
     IA 127 (31.5)
     IB 107 (26.6)
     IIA 64 (15.9)
     IIB 19 (4.7)
     IIIA 77 (19.1)
     IIIB 9 (2.2)
    HLA class I IHC (%)
     < 25 249 (61.8)
     25–74 120 (29.8)
     ≥ 75 34 (8.4)
    PD-L1 IHC (%)
     < 1 338 (83.9)
     1–49 42 (10.4)
     ≥ 50 23 (5.7)
    Total 403 (100)
    Clinicopathologic feature HLA class I expression
    		 PD-L1 expression (1% cut-off)
    		 PD-L1 expression (50% cut-off)
    Retained (normal) Reduced (loss) p-value Negative (< 1%) Positive (≥ 1%) p-value Negative (< 50%) Positive (≥ 50%) p-value
    Total 34 (8.4) 369 (91.6) 338 (83.9) 65 (16.1) 380 (94.3) 23 (5.7)
    Age (yr)
     < 65 11 (5.5) 190 (94.5) .033 174 (86.6) 27 (13.4) .142 191 (95.0) 10 (5.0) .527
     ≥ 65 23 (11.4) 179 (88.6) 164 (81.2) 38 (18.8) 189 (93.6) 13 (6.4)
    Sex
     Male 16 (8.4) 175 (91.6) .967 155 (81.2) 36 (18.8) .159 176 (92.1) 15 (7.9) .078
     Female 18 (8.5) 194 (91.5) 183 (86.3) 29 (13.7) 204 (96.2) 8 (3.8)
    Smoking status
     Never 19 (7.9) 223 (92.1) .604 206 (85.1) 36 (14.9) .402 231 (95.5) 11 (4.5) .218
     Ex or current 15 (9.3) 146 (90.7) 132 (82.0) 29 (18.0) 149 (92.5) 12 (7.5)
    Differentiation
     WD 2 (5.9) 32 (94.1) .422a 34 (100.0) 0 < .001 34 (100) 0 .008a
     MD 25 (7.9) 290 (92.1) 270 (85.7) 45 (14.3) 300 (95.2) 15 (4.8)
     PD 7 (13.0) 47 (87.0) 34 (63.0) 20 (37.0) 46 (85.2) 8 (14.8)
    Genetic statusb
     EGFR mutant 17 (8.9) 175 (91.1) .860a 175 (91.1) 17 (8.9) .003 190 (99.0) 2 (1.0) < .001a
     ALK mutant 1 (5.0) 19 (95.0) 17 (85.0) 3 (15.0) 18 (90.0) 2 (10.0)
     KRAS mutant 2 (12.5) 14 (87.5) 10 (62.5) 6 (37.5) 12 (75.0) 4 (25.0)
     EGFR(–)/ALK(–)/KRAS(–) 5 (10.0) 45 (90.0) 39 (78.0) 11 (22.0) 45 (90.0) 5 (10.0)
    Pleural invasion
     Negative 19 (8.1) 216 (91.9) .764 199 (84.7) 36 (15.3) .601 224 (95.3) 11 (4.7) .294
     Positive 15 (8.9) 153 (91.1) 139 (82.7) 29 (17.3) 156 (92.9) 12 (7.1)
    Vascular invasion
     Negative 19 (6.3) 283 (93.7) .007 263 (87.1) 39 (12.9) .002 289 (95.7) 13 (4.3) .036
     Positive 15 (14.9) 86 (85.1) 75 (74.3) 26 (25.7) 91 (90.1) 10 (9.9)
    Lymphatic invasion
     Negative 19 (8.9) 194 (91.1) .712 184 (86.4) 29 (13.6) .146 206 (96.7) 7 (3.3) .027
     Positive 15 (7.9) 175 (92.1) 154 (81.1) 36 (18.9) 174 (91.6) 16 (8.4)
    Perineural invasion
     Negative 30 (7.9) 350 (92.1) .118a 321 (84.5) 59 (15.5) .236a 360 (94.7) 20 (5.3) .136a
     Positive 4 (17.4) 19 (82.6) 17 (73.9) 6 (26.1) 20 (87.0) 3 (13.0)
    Tumor size (cm)
     ≤ 3 13 (5.4) 229 (94.6) .007 208 (86.0) 34 (14.0) .164 233 (96.3) 9 (3.7) .035
     > 3 21 (13.0) 140 (87.0) 130 (80.7) 31 (19.3) 147 (91.3) 14 (8.7)
    N stage
     N0 19 (6.9) 256 (93.1) .106 238 (86.5) 37 (13.5) .032 261 (94.9) 14 (5.1) .434
     ≥ N1 15 (11.7) 113 (88.3) 100 (78.1) 28 (21.9) 119 (93.0) 9 (7.0)
    Stage
     I 14 (6.0) 220 (94.0) .012 204 (87.2) 30 (12.8) .079 222 (94.9) 12 (5.1) .484a
     II 6 (7.2) 77 (92.8) 64 (77.1) 19 (22.9) 76 (91.6) 7 (8.4)
     III 14 (16.3) 72 (83.7) 70 (81.4) 16 (18.6) 82 (95.3) 4 (4.7)
    Stage I and others
     I 14 (6.0) 220 (94.0) .037 204 (87.2) 30 (12.8) .034 222 (94.9) 12 (5.1) .555
     ≥ IIa 20 (11.8) 149 (88.2) 134 (79.3) 35 (20.7) 158 (93.5) 11 (6.5)
    PD-L1 status (1% cutoff)
     Negative 24 (7.1) 314 (92.9) .028
     Positive 10 (15.4) 55 (84.6)
    Clinicopathologic variable Univariate
    		 Multivariate
    p-value p-value HR (95% CI)
    Age
     < 65 yr vs ≥ 65 yr < .001 < .001 2.871 (1.715–4.804)
    Sex
     Male vs female < .001
    Smoking Hx
     Never vs ever or current .025 .026 1.774 (1.073–2.935)
    Differentiation
     WD vs MD vs PD .077 - -
    Genetic status
     EGFR mutant vs ALK mutant vs KRAS mutant vs wild typea .179 - -
    Pleural invasion
     Negative vs positive < .001 - -
    Vascular invasion
     Negative vs positive .002 - -
    Lymphatic invasion
     Negative vs positive < .001 - -
    Perineural invasion
     Negative vs positive < .001 - -
    Tumor size
     ≤ 3 cm vs > 3 cm < .001 - -
    N category
     N0 vs ≥ N1 < .001 .122 2.143 (0.815–5.632)
    Stage
     I vs II vs III < .001 .039
     I vs II .294 1.732 (0.621–4.827)
     I vs III .027 3.295 (1.142–9.508)
    HLA expression
     < 75% vs ≥ 75% .115 - -
    PD-L1 expression
     < 1% vs ≥ 1% .423 - -
    HLA(+)/PD-L1(+)
     Others vs double positive .001 < .001 6.106 (2.260–16.501)
    Table 1. Clinicopathologic characteristics

    EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1.

    Smoking status was defined as follows: never smoker (< 100 cigarettes per lifetime); ex-smoker (≥ 100 cigarettes per lifetime and quit > 1 year prior to the diagnosis); current smoker (≥ 100 cigarettes per lifetime and smoked at the time of lung cancer diagnosis or quit ≤ 1 year prior to the diagnosis);

    Differentiation was defined as follows: well differentiated (lepidic predominant); moderately differentiated (acinar or papillary predominant); poorly differentiated (micropapillary or solid predominant);

    Genetic status was evaluable for 278 patients.

    Table 2. HLA class I, PD-L1 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics

    p-value was obtained by Fisher exact test;

    Genetic status was evaluable for 278 patients.

    Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic factors and overall survival in lung ADC patients

    ADC, adenocarcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Hx, history; WD, well differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poor differentiated; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1.

    Wild type defined as EGFR(–)/ALK(–)/KRAS(–).

    Table 1.

    Table 2.

    Table 3.

    J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
    © The Korean Society of Pathologists and the Korean Society for Cytopathology.
    TOP