Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review
Pathologic interpretation of endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy for pancreatic lesions
Haeryoung Kim, Kee-Taek Jang
J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(5):367-377.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2020.07.21
  • 4,998 View
  • 185 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Pathologic interpretation of endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology/biopsy specimens is one of the most challenging tasks in cytology and surgical pathology practice, as the procedure often yields minimal amounts of diagnostic material and contains contaminants, such as blood cells and normal intestinal mucosa. EUS-FNA cytology/biopsy will nevertheless become a more popular procedure for evaluation of various pancreatic lesions because they are difficult to approach with conventional endoscopic procedures. Pathologists should understand the structural differences and limitations of EUS-FNA that make pathologic diagnosis difficult. Ancillary tests are available for differential diagnosis of EUS-FNA for various pancreatic lesions. Immunostains are the most commonly used ancillary tests, and pathologists should able to choose the necessary panel for differential diagnosis. Pathologists should review clinical history and radiologic and/or EUS findings before selecting an immunostain panel and making a pathologic diagnosis. In addition, one’s threshold of malignancy should be adjusted according to the appropriate clinical setting to avoid under-evaluation of pathologic diagnoses. Clinico-pathologic correlation is essential in pathologic evaluation of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions. Pathologists can reduce errors by correlating clinical and radiologic findings when evaluating EUS-FNA. Some molecular tests can be applied in differential diagnosis of pancreatic neoplastic and cystic lesions. Molecular data should be used as supportive evidence of a specific disease entity, rather than direct evidence, and should be correlated with clinico-pathologic findings to avoid errors in pathologic diagnosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A prospective randomized noninferiority trial comparing conventional smears and SurePathTM liquid-based cytology in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of esophageal, gastric, and duodenal lesions
    Jae Chang Jun, Sang Hyub Lee, Han Myung Lee, Sang Gyun Kim, Hyunsoo Chung, Joo Seong Kim, Namyoung Park, Jin Ho Choi, Yoonjin Kwak, Soo-Jeong Cho
    Medicine.2023; 102(29): e34321.     CrossRef
  • Double Ki-67 and synaptophysin labeling in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor biopsies
    Bokyung Ahn, Jin Kying Jung, HaeSung Jung, Yeon-Mi Ryu, Yeon Wook Kim, Tae Jun Song, Do Hyun Park, Dae wook Hwang, HyungJun Cho, Sang-Yeob Kim, Seung-Mo Hong
    Pancreatology.2022; 22(3): 427.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with 19-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions
    Changjuan Li, Jianwei Mi, Fulai Gao, Xinying Zhu, Miao Su, Xiaoli Xie, Dongqiang Zhao
    International Journal of General Medicine.2021; Volume 14: 10439.     CrossRef
Original Article
Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pancreatic Lesions
Hae Woon Baek, Min Jee Park, Ye-Young Rhee, Kyoung Bun Lee, Min A Kim, In Ae Park
J Pathol Transl Med. 2015;49(1):52-60.   Published online January 15, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2014.10.26
  • 8,899 View
  • 75 Download
  • 29 Web of Science
  • 28 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) is currently the most commonly used procedure for obtaining cytologic specimens of the pancreas. It is accurate, minimally invasive, safe and cost-effective. However, there is discrepancy between cytological and surgical diagnoses. This study was aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNAC of the pancreas. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 191 cases of pancreatic lesions initially diagnosed by EUS-FNAC with subsequent histological diagnosis between 2010 and 2012 in the Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital. Cytologic and surgical diagnoses were categorized into five groups: negative, benign, atypical, malignant, and insufficient for diagnosis. Subsequently, 167 cases with satisfactory yield in both surgical and cytology specimens were statistically analyzed to determine correlations with diagnosis. Results: In comparison to surgical diagnoses, cytologic diagnoses were true-positive in 103 cases (61.7%), true-negative in 28 cases (16.8%), false-positive in 9 cases (5.4%), and false-negative in 27 cases (16.1%). The diagnostic accuracy was 78.4%, sensitivity was 79.2%, and specificity was 75.7%. The positive predictive value was 92.0%, and negative predictive value was 50.9%. Conclusions: EUS-FNAC has high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. Overcoming the limitations of EUS-FNAC will make it a useful and reliable diagnostic tool for accurate evaluation of pancreatic lesions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Grading pancreatic adenocarcinomas on fine needle aspiration cytology. The outstanding issues
    Mrinmay Kumar Mallik, Laila Rafiq Qadan, Asit Kumar Mohanty, Ali Alali, Kusum Kapila
    Cytopathology.2024; 35(2): 256.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration with Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Gastrointestinal Lesions: A Randomized Crossover Single-Center study
    Shivaraj Afzalpurkar, Vijay Kumar Rai, Nikhil Sonthalia, Gajanan Rodge, Awanesh Tewary, Mahesh Goenka
    Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 14(01): 014.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosing and monitoring pancreatic cancer through cell-free DNA methylation: progress and prospects
    María Victoria García-Ortiz, Pablo Cano-Ramírez, Marta Toledano-Fonseca, Enrique Aranda, Antonio Rodríguez-Ariza
    Biomarker Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of preoperative EUS-FNA for distal resectable pancreatic cancer: Is it really effective enough to take risks?
    Jin-Seok Park, Jae Hoon Lee, Tae Jun Song, Joune Seup Lee, Seok Jung Jo, Dong Wook Oh, Ki Byung Song, Dae Wook Hwang, Do Hyun Park, Sang Soo Lee, Song Cheol Kim, Dong Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(5): 3192.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics‐Based Nomogram From Primary Tumor for Pretreatment Prediction of Peripancreatic Lymph Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study
    Zhenshan Shi, Chengle Ma, Xinming Huang, Dairong Cao
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2022; 55(3): 823.     CrossRef
  • Role of Pathologist in the Era of Image-Guided and EUS-Guided Aspirations: A 10-Year Study at a Single Tertiary Care Oncology Institute in North India
    Gurudutt Gupta, Anila Sharma, Meenakshi Kamboj, Anurag Sharma, Sunil Pasricha, Garima Durga, Anurag Mehta, Avinash Rao
    Acta Cytologica.2022; 66(3): 187.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Factors for Pancreatic Malignancy with Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Chronic Pancreatitis
    Jian-Han Lai, Keng-Han Lee, Chen-Wang Chang, Ming-Jen Chen, Ching-Chung Lin
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(4): 1004.     CrossRef
  • Phenotypic profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma plasma-derived small extracellular vesicles for cancer diagnosis and cancer stage prediction: a proof-of-concept study
    Wei Zhang, Ling Wang, Dan Li, Douglas H. Campbell, Bradley J. Walsh, Nicolle H. Packer, Qing Dong, Erkang Wang, Yuling Wang
    Analytical Methods.2022; 14(23): 2255.     CrossRef
  • Cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles: emerging biomarkers and therapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosis/prognosis and treatment
    Wei Zhang, Douglas H. Campbell, Bradley J. Walsh, Nicolle H. Packer, Dingbin Liu, Yuling Wang
    Journal of Nanobiotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Single Cell RNA Sequencing: A New Frontier in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Maroun Bou Zerdan, Malek Shatila, Dhruv Sarwal, Youssef Bouferraa, Morgan Bou Zerdan, Sabine Allam, Merima Ramovic, Stephen Graziano
    Cancers.2022; 14(19): 4589.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Subtyping and Precision Medicine for Pancreatic Cancer
    Fieke Froeling, Raffaella Casolino, Antonio Pea, Andrew Biankin, David Chang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(1): 149.     CrossRef
  • Reshaping preoperative treatment of pancreatic cancer in the era of precision medicine
    R. Casolino, C. Braconi, G. Malleo, S. Paiella, C. Bassi, M. Milella, S.B. Dreyer, F.E.M. Froeling, D.K. Chang, A.V. Biankin, T. Golan
    Annals of Oncology.2021; 32(2): 183.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic value of various liquid biopsy methods for pancreatic cancer
    Yuzhou Zhu, Hao Zhang, Nan Chen, Jianqi Hao, Hongyu Jin, Xuelei Ma
    Medicine.2020; 99(3): e18581.     CrossRef
  • Factors affecting cytological results of endoscopic ultrasound guided-fine needle aspiration during learning
    Jian-Han Lai, Hsiang-Hung Lin, Ching-Chung Lin
    Diagnostic Pathology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison between Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Preparation in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pancreatic Lesions
    Soo Hee Ko, Jung-Soo Pyo, Byoung Kwan Son, Hyo Young Lee, Il Whan Oh, Kwang Hyun Chung
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(5): 293.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Pancreatic Lesions With Endoscopic Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration
    Yan Luk, Wong Hoi She, Felix Che Lok Chow, Ka Wing Ma, Simon Hing Yin Tsang, Wing Chiu Dai, Tan To Cheung, Chung Mau Lo
    Surgical Innovation.2020; 27(5): 431.     CrossRef
  • The applicability of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system on reporting endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens of pancreatic lesions in situations with limited availability of ancillary tests. Experience at a single
    Mrinmay Kumar Mallik, Laila Rafiq Qadan, Abdullah Al Naseer, Ali AlAli, Taiba Al Ansari, Shafi Ahmed Inamdar Naquib, Dilip Kumar Das, Kusum Kapila
    Cytopathology.2020; 31(6): 564.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Cell-Free DNA-Based Liquid Biopsy Markers for the Non-Invasive Prognosis and Monitoring of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
    Marta Toledano-Fonseca, M. Teresa Cano, Elizabeth Inga, Rosa Rodríguez-Alonso, M. Auxiliadora Gómez-España, Silvia Guil-Luna, Rafael Mena-Osuna, Juan R. de la Haba-Rodríguez, Antonio Rodríguez-Ariza, Enrique Aranda
    Cancers.2020; 12(7): 1754.     CrossRef
  • Risk of malignancy in the categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology
    Raza S. Hoda, Elizabeth B. Finer, Ronald N. Arpin, Matthew Rosenbaum, Martha B. Pitman
    Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.2019; 8(3): 120.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine‐needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency
    Aslam Syed, Olivia Babich, Bharat Rao, Shailendra Singh, Neil Carleton, Abhishek Gulati, Archana Kulkarni, Mrinal Garg, Katie Farah, Gursimran Kochhar, Suzanne Morrissey, Marcia Mitre, Abhijit Kulkarni, Manish Dhawan, Jan F. Silverman, Majed Pharaon, Shya
    Diagnostic Cytopathology.2019; 47(11): 1138.     CrossRef
  • Liquid Biopsy as Surrogate for Tissue for Molecular Profiling in Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Towards Precision Medicine
    Claudio Luchini, Nicola Veronese, Alessia Nottegar, Vera Cappelletti, Maria G. Daidone, Lee Smith, Christopher Parris, Lodewijk A. A. Brosens, Maria G. Caruso, Liang Cheng, Christopher L. Wolfgang, Laura D. Wood, Michele Milella, Roberto Salvia, Aldo Scar
    Cancers.2019; 11(8): 1152.     CrossRef
  • It is necessary to exam bottom and top slide smears of EUS-FNA for pancreatic cancer
    Jong-chan Lee, Haeryoung Kim, Hyoung Woo Kim, Jongchan Lee, Kyu-hyun Paik, Jingu Kang, Jin-Hyeok Hwang, Jaihwan Kim
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International.2018; 17(6): 553.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative EUS-guided FNA: effects on peritoneal recurrence and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer
    Sun Hwa Kim, Young Sik Woo, Kwang Hyuck Lee, Jong Kyun Lee, Kyu Taek Lee, Joo Kyung Park, Soo Hoon Kang, Ji Won Kim, Jae Keun Park, Sung-Wook Park
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 88(6): 926.     CrossRef
  • Cytological characteristics of atypical cells in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens obtained from the pancreas
    Shikine ESAKA, Yoko MATSUDA, Yuri HAMASHIMA, Masayuki IMAIZUMI, Hiroya KOJIMA, Yuri KISO, Hiroto SHIRAHATA, Mayumi KINOSHITA, Akemi SUZUKI, Tomio ARAI
    The Journal of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology.2018; 57(4): 199.     CrossRef
  • Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
    Dirk Domagk, Kofi W Oppong, Lars Aabakken, Laszlo Czakó, Tibor Gyökeres, Gianpiero Manes, Peter Meier, Jan-Werner Poley, Thierry Ponchon, Andrea Tringali, Cristina Bellisario, Silvia Minozzi, Carlo Senore, Cathy Bennett, Michael Bretthauer, Cesare Hassan,
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2018; 6(10): 1448.     CrossRef
  • Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
    Dirk Domagk, Kofi W. Oppong, Lars Aabakken, Laszlo Czakó, Tibor Gyökeres, Gianpiero Manes, Peter Meier, Jan-Werner Poley, Thierry Ponchon, Andrea Tringali, Cristina Bellisario, Silvia Minozzi, Carlo Senore, Cathy Bennett, Michael Bretthauer, Cesare Hassan
    Endoscopy.2018; 50(11): 1116.     CrossRef
  • Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions
    Lawrence MJ Best, Vishal Rawji, Stephen P Pereira, Brian R Davidson, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Percutaneous ultrasound‐guided core needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: Results in 250 patients
    Guven Kahriman, Nevzat Ozcan, Serap Dogan, Soner Ozmen, Kemal Deniz
    Journal of Clinical Ultrasound.2016; 44(8): 470.     CrossRef
Case Report
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Diagnosis of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm: Three Case Reports with Review of Literature
Joon Seon Song, Chong Woo Yoo, Youngmee Kwon, Eun Kyung Hong
Korean J Pathol. 2012;46(4):399-406.   Published online August 23, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2012.46.4.399
  • 7,700 View
  • 51 Download
  • 14 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is relatively rare and it occurs almost exclusively in women. We recently experienced three cases of SPN diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). These three cases were two male and one female patient whose age was 29, 37, and 44 years old. Radiological diagnosis was pancreatic endocrine tumor (PEN) showing solid with a heterogenous echogenicity. EUS-FNA cytology specimens consisted of single cells and aggregates of uniform cells, forming microadenoid structures, branching, papillary clusters with delicate fibrovascular cores. In conclusion, a single diagnosis of SPN based on clinical and radiological findings would be risky because there is a possibility of it being misdiagnosed as PEN or other malignancies. An EUS-FNA is therefore essential for establishing the diagnosis. In addition, the pathologists should recognize the characteristic cytologic findings with immunoprofiles of SPN to prevent misdiagnosis of SPN.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resections for solid pseudopapillary tumors located in the head of pancreas
    Zhengdong Zou, Lu Feng, Bing Peng, Jianhua Liu, Yunqiang Cai
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Solid pancreatic masses in children: A review of current evidence and clinical challenges
    Kelli N. Patterson, Andrew T. Trout, Archana Shenoy, Maisam Abu-El-Haija, Jaimie D. Nathan
    Frontiers in Pediatrics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm in male patients: systematic review with three new cases
    Anna Caterina Milanetto, Anna-Lea Gais Zürcher, Lorenzo Macchi, Alina David, Claudio Pasquali
    Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(4): 1285.     CrossRef
  • Silencing c-Myc Enhances the Antitumor Activity of Bufalin by Suppressing the HIF-1α/SDF-1/CXCR4 Pathway in Pancreatic Cancer Cells
    Xia Liu, Yayun Zhou, Jiamin Peng, Bei Xie, Qiyang Shou, Jianchao Wang
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous colorectal and parenchymal-sparing liver resection for advanced colorectal carcinoma with synchronous liver metastases: Between conventional and mini-invasive approaches
    Emilio De Raffele, Mariateresa Mirarchi, Dajana Cuicchi, Ferdinando Lecce, Riccardo Casadei, Claudio Ricci, Saverio Selva, Francesco Minni
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(42): 6529.     CrossRef
  • Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas showing marked distal atrophy: A case report
    Masanori Tsujie, Tomoko Wakasa, Shigeto Mizuno, Hajime Ishikawa, Hironobu Manabe, Taichi Koyama, Kotaro Kitani, Shumpei Satoi, Keisuke Inoue, Shuichi Fukuda, Toshihiko Kawasaki, Masao Yukawa, Yoshio Ohta, Masatoshi Inoue
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2019; 55: 136.     CrossRef
  • Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in pediatric patients: A case report and institutional case series
    Justin B. Mahida, Rajan K. Thakkar, Jon Walker, Rulong Shen, Brian D. Kenney, Vinay Prasad, Jennifer H. Aldrink
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2015; 3(4): 149.     CrossRef
  • Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS‐FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra‐abdominal, and submucosal lesions
    Shafqat Mehmood, Amna Jahan, Asif Loya, Muhammed Aasim Yusuf
    Diagnostic Cytopathology.2015; 43(4): 278.     CrossRef
  • Multicentric solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a case report
    Megumi Yamaguchi, Toshikatsu Fukuda, Masahiro Nakahara, Mio Amano, Daisuke Takei, Masumi Kawashima, Yusuke Sumi, Hironobu Amano, Shuji Yonehara, Keiji Hanada, Toshio Noriyuki
    Surgical Case Reports.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A solid pseudopapillary neoplasm without cysts that occurred in a patient diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a case report
    Masakuni Fujii, Masao Yoshioka, Takefumi Niguma, Hiroaki Saito, Toru Kojima, Soichiro Nose, Junji Shiode
    Journal of Medical Case Reports.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Management and Long-Term Follow-Up of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of Pancreas: A Large Series from a Single Institution
    Yunqiang Cai, Xun Ran, Siming Xie, Xin Wang, Bing Peng, Gang Mai, Xubao Liu
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2014; 18(5): 935.     CrossRef
  • A case of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm in a middle-aged male preoperatively diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)
    Shin KATO, Takuya HONBU, Moriya ZAKIMI, Kenji CHINEN, Tomiaki KUBOTA, Masayuki ARASHIRO, Kaoru KIKUCHI, Takahiro MURAKAMI, Fumihito KUNISHIMA
    Suizo.2014; 29(2): 263.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration improves the pre-operative diagnostic yield of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: an international multicenter case series (with video)
    Joanna K. Law, Alina Stoita, Wallia Weaver, Ferga C. Gleeson, Andrew M. Dries, Amanda Blackford, Vandhana Kiswani, Eun Ji Shin, Mouen A. Khashab, Marcia Irene Canto, Vikesh K. Singh, Anne Marie Lennon
    Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(9): 2592.     CrossRef
  • Multiple Diagnostic Imaging of a Patient with Solid Pseudopapillary Tumour of the Pancreas: EUS, CT and FDG PET/CT
    Ari Chong, Jung-Min Ha, Seong Young Kwon
    Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2014; 48(1): 82.     CrossRef

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine