Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-04.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 Transcription Factors in Breast Carcinoma.
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Pathol Transl Med > Volume 39(5); 2005 > Article
Original Article Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 Transcription Factors in Breast Carcinoma.
Eun Young Kim, Hyun Jin Jo, Mi Ja Lee
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2005;39(5):301-306
DOI: https://doi.org/
1Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
2Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
3Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea. mjblee@chosun.ac.kr
  • 2,000 Views
  • 34 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

BACKGROUND
The E2F family (E2F1 to E2F6) of transcription factors plays a key role in cell cycle progression. Some act as oncogenes and others act as tumor suppressor genes (TSG) in a tissue-specific manner. E2F4 may function as a TSG. However, the role of E2F4 in breast carcinogenesis remains controversial. Also the clinical impact of E2F2 expression on breast cancer remains unknown.
METHODS
Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 were assessed immunohistochemically in 113 breast carcinomas and were compared with clinicopathological variables, expressions of G1/S checkpoint proteins (p16, cyclin D1 and Rb), and DNA ploidy to identify their possible role and to assess their prognostic value in breast cancer.
RESULTS
Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 were detected in 48 cases (42.5%) and 66 cases (58.4%), respectively. Expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 were significantly correlated with large tumor size (p<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). There was no correlation between expressions of E2F4 or E2F2 and any other variables, including age, histologic grade, DNA ploidy and expressions of p16, cyclin D1 and Rb.
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that expressions of E2F4 and E2F2 are associated with growth and spread of breast cancer and indicate poor prognosis.

Related articles

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine