Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Pathol Transl Med > Forthcoming articles > Article
Review Article
Recent topics on thyroid cytopathology: reporting systems and ancillary studies
Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa,orcid, Ayana Suzukiorcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2025.04.18
Published online: June 30, 2025

Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan

Corresponding Author Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa, MD, PhD, Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, 8-2-35 Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan Tel: +81-78-371-3721 Fax: +81-78-371-3645 E-mail: mhirokawa@kuma-h.or.jp
• Received: April 1, 2025   • Revised: April 17, 2025   • Accepted: April 18, 2025

© The Korean Society of Pathologists/The Korean Society for Cytopathology

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 28 Views
  • 4 Download
  • As fine-needle aspiration techniques and diagnostic methodologies for thyroid nodules have continued to evolve and reporting systems have been updated accordingly, we need to be up to date with the latest information to achieve accurate diagnoses. However, the diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies for thyroid nodules vary across laboratories and institutions. Several differences exist between Western and Eastern practices regarding thyroid fine-needle aspiration. This review describes the reporting systems for thyroid cytopathology and ancillary studies. Updated reporting systems enhance the accuracy, consistency, and clarity of cytology reporting, leading to improved patient outcomes and management strategies. Although a single global reporting system is optimal, reporting systems tailored to each country is acceptable. In such cases, compatibility must be ensured to facilitate data sharing. Ancillary methods include liquid-based cytology, immunocytochemistry, biochemical measurements, flow cytometry, molecular testing, and artificial intelligence, all of which improve diagnostic accuracy. These methods continue to evolve, and cytopathologists should actively adopt the latest methods and information to achieve more accurate diagnoses. We believe this review will be useful to practitioners of routine thyroid cytology.
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is widely used as the most effective preoperative diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules. Its primary purpose is to triage patients with thyroid nodules into appropriate treatment plans, which has contributed to reducing the rate of unnecessary thyroid surgery in patients with benign nodules. FNA techniques and diagnostic methodologies for thyroid nodules have continued to evolve, and the corresponding reporting systems have been updated accordingly. Therefore, medical systems need to be updated with the latest information to achieve more accurate diagnoses. However, the diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies for thyroid nodules vary across laboratories and hospitals.
Several differences exist between Western and Eastern practices regarding thyroid FNA. Various factors may play a role, including ethnicity, lifestyle, medical environment, surgical indication, and interpretation of pathological criteria. This review describes the reporting systems for thyroid cytopathology and ancillary techniques used to improve diagnostic accuracy. Updated reporting systems enhance the accuracy, consistency, and clarity of cytology reporting, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and management strategies. Ancillary methods include liquid-based cytology, immunocytochemistry, biochemical measurements, flow cytometry, molecular testing, and artificial intelligence (AI), all of which improve diagnostic accuracy. Not all institutions worldwide have access to the ancillary methods presented in this review; nevertheless, the information will be valuable for future implementation. In addition, this review explains the differences in practices related to thyroid FNA between Western and Eastern countries. This review will be useful to readers who practice routine thyroid cytology.
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) was developed in 2007 to facilitate communication between cytopathologists and clinicians [1]. It is now a global reporting system for thyroid FNA cytology. However, interpretations and applications vary among individuals, institutions, and countries. Different reporting systems have been used across countries such as England [2], Italy [3], and Japan [4,5]. Although it would be best to establish a single global reporting system, systems adapted by country are acceptable. In such cases, compatibility must be ensured to facilitate data sharing.
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology
The Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference was held on October 22 and 23, 2007, in Bethesda, MD, USA, and a framework for TBSRTC was formed [1]. TBSRTC consists of six categories for reporting thyroid nodules. Each category has an implied risk of malignancy (ROM) and the usual clinical management strategy. The third edition of TBSRTC was proposed in 2023 [6], and its main revisions are listed in Table 1. In this edition, diagnostic categories were unified under a single name, i.e., nondiagnostic for nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) for AUS/follicular lesion of undetermined significance, and follicular neoplasm (FN) for FN/suspicious for FN. The ROM was revised based on the data published after the second edition (Table 2). Herein, AUS was subcategorized as AUS with nuclear atypia or AUS-other because the ROM for resected AUS with nuclear atypia (36%–44%) was higher than that in AUS-other (15%–23%) [6].
A definitive diagnosis of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) requires an extensive histological examination of the entire tumor capsule. Therefore, NIFTP cannot be diagnosed by cytology. Most tumors are cytologically classified into intermediate diagnostic categories (AUS and FN). Since NIFTP is now considered non-carcinomatous, the ROM for each diagnostic category decreased by 1.3% to 9.1% [6]. The goal of the third edition was to increase awareness of the potential diagnostic clues for NIFTP. Follicular lesions with mild or focal nuclear alterations associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) were categorized as FN.
The same diagnostic categories were applied to pediatric patients (Table 3). However, the ROM and management recommendations for these patients are not the same as those for adults. The ROMs in pediatric patients were higher than those in adult patients in all categories. This difference is especially large for FN (50% in pediatric cases, 30% in adults) [6]. Molecular testing, diagnostic lobectomy, and surveillance are not recommended in pediatric patients.
Japanese system
In 2005, the Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology was initially proposed by the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, classifying cytological findings into five categories: (I) inadequate, (II) normal or benign, (III) intermediate, (IV) malignancy suspected, and (V) malignant [4]. In 2013, the Japan Thyroid Association introduced an original diagnostic system that incorporated malignancy risk estimates for each category, and it uniquely subclassified FN into “likely benign,” “borderline,” and “likely malignant” subtypes [7]. However, the system was not widely adopted because general cytopathologists were unable to accurately differentiate among classes. In 2015, the current Japanese reporting system was proposed by the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery [4]. It was revised by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Pathology in 2019 [4] and again in 2023 [5]. The Japanese system comprises seven categories: unsatisfactory, cyst fluid, benign, undetermined significance, FN, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant. The diagnostic criteria for each category are identical to those used for TBSRTC; the only difference is that cystic fluid is handled as an independent category. Data showed that the ROM in cyst fluid only (CFO) nodules was 0.2% [8], which was apparently lower than that in nondiagnostic nodules excluding CFO (5.6%) and benign nodules (1.2%) [9,10]. In addition, Japanese endocrinologists did not agree that reporting as nondiagnostic despite having aspirated large amounts of samples.
In Asian countries, the prevalence of NIFTP among cases previously diagnosed as PTCs was relatively low, ranging from 0% to 4.7% [11-13]. In Japan, many cases of NIFTP had previously been classified histologically as follicular thyroid adenomas due to insufficient nuclear features of PTC and had been categorized cytologically as FN [14,15]. Among patients originally diagnosed with follicular thyroid adenoma, 16.7% to 41.3% were subsequently identified as NIFTP [15]. Thus, adopting the NIFTP category has had a limited impact on the cytological classification and treatment strategies in Japan compared to Western countries [16].
The Japanese system does not include the ROM or clinical management for the different diagnostic categories due to insufficient data, and there is no standardized consensus on clinical management. As described in other parts of this article, both the ROM and clinical management in Japan differ from those in the West. Therefore, we need to determine the ROM and provide the recommended clinical management strategy in Japan. Recently, we examined the frequency, re-aspiration rate, resection rate, ROM, and clinical management of each of the seven categories using multi-institutional data from Japanese institutions. Based on these results, we propose the ROM and recommend clinical management (Table 4) [17] different from that in the West. For example, the ROM (11.4%) of FN in Japan is considerably lower than that of TBSRTC. Ultrasound findings are important for clinical management, so a more conservative strategy is recommended. As unsatisfactory and undetermined nodules with benign ultrasound findings were followed without re-aspiration, their re-aspiration rates were low, 17.8% and 12.6%, respectively [17]. Active surveillance has been accepted as an option for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma nodules [18,19]. Therefore, the resection rates of suspicious for malignancy and malignant nodules were considerably low at 77.8% and 70.8%, respectively. Table 5 shows papillary thyroid microcarcinomas for which active surveillance is not recommended. Active surveillance has emerged as a strategy to address the alarming concern of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk thyroid cancer [20]. However, successful implementation requires accurate cytological diagnosis, high-quality imaging, a definite medical strategy, and comprehensive informed consent from the patient. It is also important to avoid aspirating small nodules, <10 mm in Western countries [6] and <5 mm in Japan [21], even when malignancy is suspected on imaging. Therefore, we concluded that the same diagnostic categories and criteria should be used, but ROM and recommended clinical management strategy should be adapted by country.
FNA is the most accurate and cost-effective procedure for initial evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules. The sensitivity and specificity of FNA are reported to be 68%–98% and 56%–100%, respectively [22]. Ancillary studies using aspirated materials, including liquid-based cytology (LBC), immunocytochemistry, biochemical measurements, flow cytometry, molecular testing, and AI, can improve the diagnostic accuracy of FNA. Herein, we describe the indications, methods, and characteristics of ancillary studies based on our experience.
Liquid-based cytology
LBC refers to the preparation of cytological samples suspended in preservative liquids. Table 6 shows the advantages and disadvantages of LBC over direct smears [23-26]. The most important clinical implication of this procedure is a reduction in the number of inadequate specimens. This is due to the higher cell collection rate, removal of red blood cells, reduction in colloid, and avoidance of degeneration via smearing.
The differences in cytological findings of LBCs from those of direct smears will affect the results (Table 7) [26-28]. The LBC preservative has proteolytic and hemolytic effects that remove colloids and red blood cells, simplifying observation of cellular components. However, several diagnostic clues may become less visible, such as lymphocytes in Hashimoto thyroiditis, overlapping and ground glass nuclei in PTC, and lymphoglandular bodies in lymphoma. On the other hand, convoluted nuclei is considered diagnostic clues for PTC. Nuclear size generally decreases in LBC specimens, but the nuclei of lymphoma cells are enlarged and show a meshed chromatin pattern. As the cell shape is better preserved in LBC than direct smears, tall cell and hobnail subtypes of PTC are more easily recognized. Similarly, the tail-like cytoplasmic characteristics of medullary thyroid carcinomas are well-preserved.
Because the cytological findings of LBC specimens differ from those of direct smears, experience and knowledge are required for proper analysis [26,28]. Therefore, a combined method is recommended when implementing the LBC method (Fig. 1). After preparing direct smears, needle washout using the LBC preservative fluid is performed, and the resulting specimen is used for LBC. In our experience, the number of cellular components in LBC specimens is often greater than in conventional smears.
Immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is primarily employed to determine the origin of tumor cells, including follicular epithelial cells, C cells, lymphocytes, parathyroid cells, thymic cells, and metastatic cancer. Ideally, both positive and negative antibodies should be tested together. To prepare multiple ICC slides from a single cytological sample, we recommend the cell transfer method [29]. This method can be performed even if the decision to perform ICC is made after observing Papanicolaou-stained specimens. Table 8 shows the immunocytochemical panels used in routine practice at our institution. Three patterns can be recognized as positive localization: nuclear, cytoplasmic, and cell membrane. Among these, the preferred antibodies are those with nuclear reactivity. Cell membranous and cytoplasmic reactivities are frequently weak and cannot be identified in naked cells [30]. ICC can also be used to determine the subtype of tumors [31-33], differentiate and grade carcinomas [34-36], and detect genetic abnormalities [37,38]. However, ICC cannot be used to differentiate follicular adenomas from follicular carcinomas.
ICC can reduce the number of AUS cases, repeat FNA, and diagnostic surgery. In contrast, compared with immunohistochemical studies, quality control, use of several antibodies, assessment of staining results, and development of manuals for staining methods in ICC are more difficult. We should actively utilize ICC for diagnosis and fully understand its limitations and pitfalls.
Biochemical measurements
Biochemical measurements using the washout fluid of aspiration needle can be highly useful in certain scenarios [39-46]. When metastatic thyroid carcinoma of the lymph node is suspected upon ultrasound, measurement of thyroglobulin levels in the washout fluid of the lymph node aspirates could improve diagnostic sensitivity [44-46]. PTCs frequently exhibit cystic metastases, even when the primary lesion is not cystic. The materials aspirated from such lesions contain foamy histiocytes but may not include carcinoma cells (Fig. 2). In such cases, high fluid thyroglobulin levels can confirm metastasis. Notably, thyroglobulin measurement is not recommended for central lymph node samples. Thyroid organs or beds may also be present along the needle route (Fig. 3). Calcitonin measurement is useful in suspected cases of medullary thyroid carcinoma [41,42]. This method can be used for both thyroid and metastatic lesions. In our institution, calcitonin measurement is always performed in cases with increased serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels but no carcinoma in the gastrointestinal tract or hepato-biliary-pancreatic region. Measuring parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in the washout fluid of parathyroid lesions may also be useful. However, preoperative parathyroid FNA is not recommended, except in unusual and difficult cases of primary hyperparathyroidism, and should not be performed if parathyroid carcinoma is suspected [47,48]. We perform this procedure under suspicion of a parathyroid cyst, in which the aspirates are usually colorless. Because these specimens do not contain any cells, cytological diagnosis of parathyroid cyst is not possible [43]. PTH measurement is the only method to confirm diagnosis of parathyroid cysts.
Flow cytometry
Almost all primary thyroid lymphomas are of B cell origin and are divided into two main categories: diffuse large B cell lymphoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [49,50]. MALT lymphomas are frequently confused with Hashimoto thyroiditis, which is characterized by high lymphocytic infiltration. To confirm the diagnosis of lymphoma and distinguish between lymphoma and Hashimoto thyroiditis, a repeat FNA for flow cytometry is desirable [6]. Theoretically, B cell lymphomas reveal either a κ or λ light chain (light chain restriction). In contrast, lymphocytes and plasma cells observed in patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis are polyclonal. We defined light chain restriction as a κ-to-λ ratio less than 0.5 or greater than 3.0 [50,51]. The positivity rate for light chain restriction in lymphoma cases was 69.2%–75.0% [50,51]. The accuracy was almost the same as that using resected materials (69.2%) [52]. Lymphoma cases without light chain restriction showed low light chain positivity rates (<25%) and a B cell-to-T cell ratio >2.0. Given this background, a diagnostic algorithm using flow cytometry to evaluate primary thyroid lymphomas has been proposed (Fig. 4) [49]. However, it is unclear whether this algorithm is applicable to cases of extrathyroidal lymphoma. Currently, flow cytometry using aspirated samples is not popular in Asian countries [49] but should be used more actively to improve the preoperative diagnosis of lymphoma.
Molecular testing
In Western countries, molecular testing is an option for the management of clinically and/or cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules [6,53,54]. Since the testing reveals a high negative predictive value to rule out carcinoma, low-risk tumors without gene mutation should be followed. Previously, repeat FNA and diagnostic surgery were recommended for AUS and FN nodules, respectively [1]. Consequently, unnecessary thyroid resection was avoided and healthcare costs were reduced. However, in most Asian countries, molecular testing is not performed in medical practice [55]. This can be attributed to the lack of insurance coverage, the absence of commercial availability, and the extremely high cost. Even though such testing is not performed, the repeat FNA rate (AUS, 7.5%–42.2%; FN, 0%–11.1%) and resection rate (AUS, 14.1%–66.7%; FN, 25.0%–67.7%) are not high [17]. In Asian countries, follow-up is the preferred approach for intermediate thyroid nodules, and surgical resection is performed for nodules suspected to be malignant based on clinical and sonographic findings [17,56,57]. Nishino [53] explained the differences between the Western and Asian treatment strategies for intermediate nodules. A lower tolerance for uncertainty has historically favored diagnostic surgery for intermediate nodules in Western countries, and molecular testing with a high negative predictive value to rule out carcinoma has been a priority. In contrast, in Asian countries, follow-up is the preferred approach, and findings with a high positive predictive value may suffice for identification of nodules that warrant immediate thyroidectomy.
Artificial intelligence
AI was first applied to the analysis of thyroid cytology specimens in 1996, with an overall accuracy of 90.61% [58]. It has since been used in several studies to analyze thyroid cytology images. Various input data for training and evaluation in AI have been used, such as direct smears or LBC specimens, Papanicolaou- or Giemsa-stained specimens, and patch or whole-slide imaging data [59-63]. Lee et al. [63] reported that the accuracy of AI models has become higher than that of pathologists (99.71% vs. 88.91%, respectively). However, currently AI methods are inadequate for analyzing thyroid FNA cytology cases in routine practice. Though AI analyses mainly focus on differentiating between two lesions (e.g., benign lesions and PTC), AI models that can be adopted in clinical practice have been developed [64,65]. The precision-recall area under the curve (PR AUC) of one such developed model was >0.95, except for poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PR AUC, 0.49) and medullary thyroid carcinoma (PR AUC, 0.91) [64]. These two carcinomas are difficult to diagnose, even by experts in thyroid cytology. The results showed that the accuracy of AI annotated by cytopathologists resembled that of the cytopathologists. This can be improved using unsupervised machine learning. Two reports indicated that AI allowed distinction of follicular thyroid adenoma and follicular thyroid carcinoma, previously thought to be impossible [62,64]. AI technology is steadily improving, and its outcomes will be used in clinical practice, including as a secondary screening tool for benign specimens (Fig. 5A). Similar to molecular testing, AI may also be involved in clinical management of AUS and FN nodules. Online AI platforms can be used for consultation purposes (Fig. 5B).
In this review, we described reporting systems and ancillary studies for thyroid FNA cytology. Though a single global reporting system would be optimal, modifications by country are acceptable. Moreover, compatibility is necessary for data comparisons and clinical/academic advancement. As ancillary studies continue to evolve, cytopathologists should actively adopt the latest methods and information to provide more accurate diagnoses of FNA specimens.
Fig. 1.
Combined direct smear and liquid-based cytology methods.
jptm-2025-04-18f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma in a lateral lymph node after thyroidectomy. (A) The lymph node is cystic (ultrasound B-mode). (B) Aspirated material showing histiocytes but no carcinoma cells (Papanicolaou stain).
jptm-2025-04-18f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Thyroglobulin measurement using needle washout fluid should not be performed for central lymph node samples.
jptm-2025-04-18f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Diagnostic algorithm using flow cytometry for evaluating primary thyroid lymphoma.
jptm-2025-04-18f4.jpg
Fig. 5.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI). (A) As a secondary screening method for specimens determined to be benign or those that need reassessment for intermediate categories. (B) For consultation.
jptm-2025-04-18f5.jpg
Table 1.
Main revisions in the third edition of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology [6]
1 Diagnostic categories were unified under a single name.
 Nondiagnostic for nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory
 AUS for AUS/FLUS
 FN for FN/SFN
2 The risk of malignancy has been revised.
3 AUS was subcategorized into AUS with nuclear atypia or AUS-other.
4 FN included mild or focal nuclear alterations associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
5 Data from the pediatric population were also included.
6 Terminology was harmonized with the fifth edition of the WHO classification.
7 Differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinomas were included.
8 Chapters covering clinical perspectives, imaging studies, molecular testing, and ancillary tests were added.
9 Images were updated.

AUS, atypia of undetermined significance; FLUS, follicular lesion of undetermined significance; FN, follicular neoplasm; SFN, suspicious for follicular neoplasm; WHO, World Health Organization.

Table 2.
ROM and usual management for adult patients in The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology
Diagnostic category ROM (%), mean (range) Usual management
Nondiagnostic 13 (5–20) Repeat FNA with ultrasound guidance
Benign 4 (2–7) Clinical and sonographic follow-up
Atypia of undetermined significance 22 (13–30) Repeat FNA, molecular testing, diagnostic lobectomy, or surveillance
Follicular neoplasm 30 (23–34) Molecular testing, diagnostic lobectomy
Suspicious for malignancy 74 (67–83) Molecular testing, lobectomy, or near-total thyroidectomy
Malignant 97 (97–100) Lobectomy or near-total thyroidectomy

Adapted from Ali SZ and VanderLaan PA (2023). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: definition, criteria, and explanatory notes, with permission from Springer [6].

ROM, risk of malignancy; FNA, fine-needle aspiration.

Table 3.
ROM and possible management recommendations for pediatric patients in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology
Diagnostic category ROM (%), mean (range) Usual management
Nondiagnostic 14 (0–33) Repeat FNA with ultrasound guidance
Benign 6 (0–27) Clinical and sonographic follow-up
Atypia of undetermined significance 28 (11–54) Repeat FNA or surgical resection
Follicular neoplasm 50 (28–100) Surgical resection
Suspicious for malignancy 81 (40–100) Surgical resection
Malignant 98 (86–100) Surgical resection

Adapted from Ali SZ and VanderLaan PA (2023). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: definition, criteria, and explanatory notes, with permission from Springer [6].

ROM, risk of malignancy; FNA, fine-needle aspiration.

Table 4.
ROM and recommended clinical management in the Japanese system for reporting thyroid cytopathology [17]
Diagnostic category ROM (%)a, mean (range) Recommended clinical management
Unsatisfactory 4.5 (3.7–9.9) Repeat FNA or follow-up for benign ultrasound findings
Cyst fluid 0.4 (0.1–2.9) Follow-up or repeat FNA for malignant ultrasound findings
Benign 0.7 (0.4–1.2)
Undetermined significance 16.7 (11.6–28.4) Repeat FNA or follow-up based on ultrasound findings or ancillary study
Follicular neoplasm 11.4 (8.9–17.0) Resection or follow-up based on other clinical findings
Suspicious for malignancy 94.2 (82.7–100) Resection or active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
Malignant 99.6 (99.1–99.8)

ROM, risk of malignancy.

aPercentage of overall cases on unsatisfactory, cystic fluid, benign, undetermined significance, and follicular neoplasms, and that of resected cases on suspicious for malignancy and malignant.

Table 5.
Papillary thyroid microcarcinomas for which active surveillance is not recommended [18,19]
Contraindications Presence of clinical node metastasis and/or clinical distant metastasis at diagnosis
Signs or symptoms of invasion to the recurrent laryngeal nerve or trachea
Aggressive papillary thyroid carcinomas (tall cell and columnar cell subtypes) and high-grade follicular-derived carcinomas (poorly differentiated carcinoma and differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinoma) identified on cytology
Unsuitability Tumors attaching to the trachea on imaging
Tumors located in the pathway of the recurrent laryngeal nerve on imaging
Table 6.
Advantages and disadvantages of liquid-based cytology compared with direct smears
Advantages Reduction of inadequate specimens
Higher cell collection rates
Fewer fields of view
Disappearance of red blood cells and colloids
Excellent preservation of cell morphology
Presence of unique diagnostic clues
Avoiding sample degeneration by smearing
Capable of preparing several samples for immunocytochemistry
Disadvantages More complicated preparation methods
High cost
Cytological findings different from those of direct smears
Obscure diagnostic clues observed on direct smears
Table 7.
Comparison of the cytological characteristics of liquid-based cytology specimens with those of direct smears
Common finding
 Blood components Hemolysis and disappearance of red blood cells, fibrin precipitation
 Colloid Dissolution and disappearance of watery colloids
 Lymphocytes Tendency to clump together
 Cell Smaller in size (shrinkage rate: cytoplasm > nuclei, benign cells > carcinoma cells)
 Cytoplasm Smaller in size, more intensely stained
 Nuclei More darkly stained, smaller in size
 Nucleoli More eosinophilic, more conspicuous
Disease-specific findings
 Follicular nodular disease Distinct cell membrane, preserved basement membrane
 Follicular neoplasm Fibrin surrounding microfollicular clusters, no intercellular windows
 Hyalinizing trabecular tumor Highlighted yellow bodies
 Papillary thyroid carcinoma Convoluted nuclei, intercellular windows, distinct tall columnar cells, no overlapping nuclei, indistinct ground glass nuclei
 Medullary thyroid carcinoma Well-defined tail-like cytoplasm
 Lymphoma Disappearance of lymphoglandular bodies, enlarged nuclei, meshed chromatin pattern, prominent and elongated nuclei
Table 8.
Immunocytochemical panels used for thyroid fine-needle aspiration
Tumor type Positive antibodies Negative antibodies
Follicular cell-derived tumors PAX8, TTF-1, thyroglobulin GATA-3, calcitonin, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD5
Hyalinizing trabecular tumor MIB-1 (cell membranous), type IV collagen (intercellular) Cytokeratin 19, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, HBME-1
Medullary thyroid carcinoma Calcitonin, CEA, chromogranin A, synaptophysin PAX8, TTF-1, thyroglobulin
Intrathyroid thymic carcinoma CD5, p63, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, CD117 PAX8, TTF-1, thyroglobulin
Parathyroid adenoma GATA-3, chromogranin A, PTH, parafibromin PAX8, TTF-1, thyroglobulin, parafibromin (CDC73 gene mutation)
Cribriform morular carcinoma Beta-catenin (nuclear and cell membranous), estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, CD5 (morules), adipophilin (subnuclear) Thyroglobulin
Renal cell carcinoma CD10, PAX8 TTF-1, thyroglobulin
Pulmonary carcinoma TTF-1, napsin A PAX8, thyroglobulin

PAX-8, paired box gene 8; TTF-1, thyroid transcription factor-1; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

  • 1. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid 2009; 19: 1159-65. ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Cross P, Chandra A, Giles T, Johnson SJ, Poller D. Guidance on the reporting of thyroid cytology specimens [Internet]. London: The Royal College of Pathologists, 2024 [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.rcpath.org/static/7d693ce4-0091-4621-97f79e2a0d1034d6/a4e0b2ba-17ae-4826-b299282b60fdc890/g089-guidance-on-reporting-of-thyroid-cytology-specimens.pdf.
  • 3. Nardi F, Basolo F, Crescenzi A, et al. Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology. J Endocrinol Invest 2014; 37: 593-9. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 4. Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Higuchi M, et al. The Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology 2019 (JRSTAC2019). Gland Surg 2020; 9: 1653-62. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 5. Kamma H, Ito Y, Suzuki S, et al. Japanese general rules for the description of thyroid cancer (9th edition) established by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Pathology. Thyroid Sci 2025; 2: 100021.Article
  • 6. Ali SZ, VanderLaan PA. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: definition, criteria, and explanatory notes. 3rd ed. Cham: Springer, 2023.
  • 7. Satoh S, Yamashita H, Kakudo K. Thyroid cytology: the Japanese system and experience at Yamashita Thyroid Hospital. J Pathol Transl Med 2017; 51: 548-54. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 8. Kanematsu R, Hirokawa M, Higuchi M, et al. Risk of malignancy and clinical outcomes of cyst fluid only nodules in the thyroid based on ultrasound and aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2020; 48: 30-4. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 9. Takada N, Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Higuchi M, Kuma S, Miyauchi A. Reappraisal of "cyst fluid only" on thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology. Endocr J 2017; 64: 759-65. ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Higuchi M, et al. Evaluation of “benign” in thyroid Bethesda system. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol 2014; 53: 257-63. Article
  • 11. Bychkov A, Hirokawa M, Jung CK, et al. Low rate of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear geatures in Asian practice. Thyroid 2017; 27: 983-4. ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Hirokawa M, Higuchi M, Suzuki A, Hayashi T, Kuma S, Miyauchi A. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features: a single-institutional experience in Japan. Endocr J 2017; 64: 1149-55. ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Rana C, Vuong HG, Nguyen TQ, et al. The incidence of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features: a meta-analysis assessing worldwide impact of the reclassification. Thyroid 2021; 31: 1502-13. ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Hirokawa M, Higuchi M, Suzuki A, Hayashi T, Kuma S, Miyauchi A. Prevalence and diagnostic significance of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features among tumors previously diagnosed as follicular adenoma: a single-institutional study in Japan. Endocr J 2020; 67: 1071-5. ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Hirokawa M, Ito M, Motoi N, et al. Prevalence and diagnostic significance of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features in Japan: a multi-institutional study. Pathol Int 2024; 74: 26-32. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 16. Higuchi M, Hirokawa M, Kanematsu R, et al. Impact of the modification of the diagnostic criteria in the 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a report of a single institution in Japan. Endocr J 2018; 65: 1193-8. ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Hirokawa M, Katoh R, Amano T, Chiba T, Yamazaki N, Satoh S, et al. Proposal for risk of malignancy and clinical management in the Japanese system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a multi-institutional study. CytoJournal 2025; 22: 55.Article
  • 18. Indications and strategy for active surveillance of adult low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: consensus statements from the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery Task Force on management for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Thyroid 2021; 31: 183-92. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 19. Miyauchi A, Ito Y, Fujishima M, et al. Long-term outcomes of active surveillance and immediate surgery for adult patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: 30-year experience. Thyroid 2023; 33: 817-25. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 20. Li M, Dal Maso L, Pizzato M, Vaccarella S. Evolving epidemiological patterns of thyroid cancer and estimates of overdiagnosis in 2013-17 in 63 countries worldwide: a population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024; 12: 824-36. ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Shimura H, Matsumoto Y, Murakami T, Fukunari N, Kitaoka M, Suzuki S. Diagnostic strategies for thyroid nodules based on ultrasonographic findings in Japan. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13: 4629.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 22. Bongiovanni M, Trimboli P, Rossi ED, Fadda G, Nobile A, Giovanella L. Diagnosis of endocrine DISEASE: High-yield thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: an update focused on ancillary techniques improving its accuracy. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 174: R53-63. ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Rossi ED, Morassi F, Santeusanio G, Zannoni GF, Fadda G. Thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology processed by ThinPrep: an additional slide decreased the number of inadequate results. Cytopathology 2010; 21: 97-102. ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Fischer AH, Clayton AC, Bentz JS, et al. Performance differences between conventional smears and liquid-based preparations of thyroid fine-needle aspiration samples: analysis of 47,076 responses in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in non-gynecologic cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137: 26-31. ArticlePubMed
  • 25. Sayer AO, Mut DT, Bodelschwingh BV, Ozguven BY, Sahin C. Comparison of conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in adequacy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsies without an accompanying cytopathologist. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2022; 56: 353-9. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 26. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Higuchi M, et al. Cytological characteristics of papillary thyroid carcinoma on LBC specimens, compared with conventional specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2015; 43: 108-13. ArticlePubMed
  • 27. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Ito A, et al. Identification of cytological features distinguishing mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma from reactive lymphoid proliferation using thyroid liquid-based cytology. Acta Cytol 2018; 62: 93-8. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 28. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Higuchi M, et al. Differentiating between benign follicular nodules and follicular neoplasms in thyroid liquid-based cytology preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 2016; 44: 659-64. ArticlePubMed
  • 29. Hirokawa M, Suzuki A. "Immunocytochemistry in cytology: myth or reality": unraveling the myth - immunocytochemistry applications in thyroid lesions. Acta Cytol 2025; 69: 7-15. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 30. Takada N, Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Higuchi M, Kuma S, Miyauchi A. Diagnostic value of GATA-3 in cytological identification of parathyroid tissues. Endocr J 2016; 63: 621-6. ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Hirokawa M, Maekawa M, Kuma S, Miyauchi A. Cribriform-morular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: cytological and immunocytochemical findings of 18 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2010; 38: 890-6. ArticlePubMed
  • 32. Takada N, Hirokawa M, Ohbayashi C, et al. Re-evaluation of MIB-1 immunostaining for diagnosing hyalinizing trabecular tumour of the thyroid: semi-automated techniques with manual antigen retrieval are more accurate than fully automated techniques. Endocr J 2018; 65: 239-44. ArticlePubMed
  • 33. Takada N, Hirokawa M, Ito M, et al. Papillary thyroid carcinoma with desmoid-type fibromatosis: a clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemical study of 14 cases. Endocr J 2017; 64: 1017-23. ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Kanematsu R, Hirokawa M, Tanaka A, et al. Evaluation of E-cadherin and beta-catenin immunoreactivity for determining undifferentiated cells in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Pathobiology 2021; 88: 351-8. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 35. Viswanathan K, Behrman DB, Lubin DJ. Grading medullary thyroid carcinoma on fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens with the International Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Grading System: a cytologic-histologic correlation. Cancer Cytopathol 2024; 132: 224-32. ArticlePubMed
  • 36. Alwelaie Y, Howaidi A, Tashkandi M, et al. Revisiting the cytomorphological features of poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a comparative analysis with indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration samples. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2023; 12: 331-40. ArticlePubMed
  • 37. Wobker SE, Kim LT, Hackman TG, Dodd LG. Use of BRAF v600e immunocytochemistry on FNA direct smears of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2015; 123: 531-9. ArticlePubMed
  • 38. Smith AL, Williams MD, Stewart J, et al. Utility of the BRAF p.V600E immunoperoxidase stain in FNA direct smears and cell block preparations from patients with thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126: 406-13. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 39. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Takada N, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for medullary thyroid carcinoma: a single institutional experience in Japan. Endocr J 2017; 64: 1099-104. ArticlePubMed
  • 40. Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Miyauchi A, et al. Thyroid fine-needle aspiration and smearing techniques. VideoEndocrinology 2018; 5: ve.2018.0119.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 41. Liu Z, Zhou W, Han R, et al. Cytology versus calcitonin assay in fine-needle aspiration biopsy wash-out fluid (FNAB-CT) in diagnosis of medullary thyroid microcarcinoma. Endocrine 2021; 74: 340-8. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 42. Diazzi C, Madeo B, Taliani E, et al. The diagnostic value of calcitonin measurement in wash-out fluid from fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules in the diagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer. Endocr Pract 2013; 19: 769-79. ArticlePubMed
  • 43. Roman-Gonzalez A, Aristizabal N, Aguilar C, et al. Parathyroid cysts: the Latin-American experience. Gland Surg 2016; 5: 559-64. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 44. Uruno T, Miyauchi A, Shimizu K, et al. Usefulness of thyroglobulin measurement in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. World J Surg 2005; 29: 483-5. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 45. Chen J, Lin Z, Xu B, Lu T, Zhang X. The efficacy and assessment value of the level of thyroglobulin wash-out after fine-needle aspiration cytodiagnosis in the evaluation of lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22: 149.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 46. Jiang HJ, Hsiao PJ. Clinical application of the ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for thyroglobulin measurement to diagnose lymph node metastasis from differentiated thyroid carcinoma-literature review. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2020; 36: 236-43. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 47. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Kanematsu R, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of parathyroid adenomas: indications as a diagnostic approach. Diagn Cytopathol 2021; 49: 70-6. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 48. Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Higuchi M, et al. Histological alterations following fine-needle aspiration for parathyroid adenoma: Incidence and diagnostic problems. Pathol Int 2021; 71: 400-5. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 49. Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Hashimoto Y, et al. Prevalence and diagnostic challenges of thyroid lymphoma: a multi-institutional study in non-Western countries. Endocr J 2020; 67: 1085-91. ArticlePubMed
  • 50. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Kanematsu R, et al. B-cell to T-cell ratio as a novel indicator in flow cytometry in the diagnosis of thyroid lymphoma. Endocr J 2022; 69: 291-7. ArticlePubMed
  • 51. Hirokawa M, Kudo T, Ota H, Suzuki A, Kobayashi K, Miyauchi A. Preoperative diagnostic algorithm of primary thyroid lymphoma using ultrasound, aspiration cytology, and flow cytometry. Endocr J 2017; 64: 859-65. ArticlePubMed
  • 52. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Higashiyama T, et al. Flow cytometric, gene rearrangement, and karyotypic analyses of 110 cases of primary thyroid lymphoma: a single-institutional experience in Japan. Endocr J 2019; 66: 1083-91. ArticlePubMed
  • 53. Nishino M. Less is more meets do more with less: Exploring differences in thyroid FNA molecular testing between Asian and Western practices. Cancer Cytopathol 2023; 131: 421-3. ArticlePubMed
  • 54. Ohori NP. Molecular testing and thyroid nodule management in North America. Gland Surg 2020; 9: 1628-38. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 55. Hirokawa M, Auger M, Jung CK, Callegari FM. Thyroid FNA cytology: the Eastern versus Western perspectives. Cancer Cytopathol 2023; 131: 415-20. ArticlePubMed
  • 56. Suzuki A, Hirokawa M, Kawakami M, Kudo T, Miyauchi A, Akamizu T. Proposal for clinical management of nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance via thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology in the absence of molecular testing. Cytopathology 2025; 36: 115-22. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 57. Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Kawakami M, Kudo T, Miyauchi A. Criteria for follow-up of thyroid nodules diagnosed as follicular neoplasm without molecular testing: the experience of a high-volume thyroid centre in Japan. Diagn Cytopathol 2022; 50: 223-9. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 58. Karakitsos P, Cochand-Priollet B, Guillausseau PJ, Pouliakis A. Potential of the back propagation neural network in the morphologic examination of thyroid lesions. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1996; 18: 494-500. PubMed
  • 59. Sanyal P, Mukherjee T, Barui S, Das A, Gangopadhyay P. Artificial intelligence in cytopathology: a neural network to identify papillary carcinoma on thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology smears. J Pathol Inform 2018; 9: 43.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 60. Guan Q, Wang Y, Ping B, et al. Deep convolutional neural network VGG-16 model for differential diagnosing of papillary thyroid carcinomas in cytological images: a pilot study. J Cancer 2019; 10: 4876-82. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 61. Dov D, Kovalsky SZ, Assaad S, et al. Weakly supervised instance learning for thyroid malignancy prediction from whole slide cytopathology images. Med Image Anal 2021; 67: 101814.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 62. Savala R, Dey P, Gupta N. Artificial neural network model to distinguish follicular adenoma from follicular carcinoma on fine needle aspiration of thyroid. Diagn Cytopathol 2018; 46: 244-9. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 63. Lee Y, Alam MR, Park H, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology with artificial intelligence technology. Thyroid 2024; 34: 723-34. ArticlePubMed
  • 64. Hirokawa M, Niioka H, Suzuki A, et al. Application of deep learning as an ancillary diagnostic tool for thyroid FNA cytology. Cancer Cytopathol 2023; 131: 217-25. ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 65. Wang J, Zheng N, Wan H, et al. Deep learning models for thyroid nodules diagnosis of fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a retrospective, prospective, multicentre study in China. Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6: e458-69. ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite this Article
        Cite this Article
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Recent topics on thyroid cytopathology: reporting systems and ancillary studies
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      • 2
      • 3
      • 4
      Recent topics on thyroid cytopathology: reporting systems and ancillary studies
      Image Image Image Image Image
      Fig. 1. Combined direct smear and liquid-based cytology methods.
      Fig. 2. Metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma in a lateral lymph node after thyroidectomy. (A) The lymph node is cystic (ultrasound B-mode). (B) Aspirated material showing histiocytes but no carcinoma cells (Papanicolaou stain).
      Fig. 3. Thyroglobulin measurement using needle washout fluid should not be performed for central lymph node samples.
      Fig. 4. Diagnostic algorithm using flow cytometry for evaluating primary thyroid lymphoma.
      Fig. 5. Use of artificial intelligence (AI). (A) As a secondary screening method for specimens determined to be benign or those that need reassessment for intermediate categories. (B) For consultation.
      Recent topics on thyroid cytopathology: reporting systems and ancillary studies
      1 Diagnostic categories were unified under a single name.
       Nondiagnostic for nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory
       AUS for AUS/FLUS
       FN for FN/SFN
      2 The risk of malignancy has been revised.
      3 AUS was subcategorized into AUS with nuclear atypia or AUS-other.
      4 FN included mild or focal nuclear alterations associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
      5 Data from the pediatric population were also included.
      6 Terminology was harmonized with the fifth edition of the WHO classification.
      7 Differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinomas were included.
      8 Chapters covering clinical perspectives, imaging studies, molecular testing, and ancillary tests were added.
      9 Images were updated.
      Diagnostic category ROM (%), mean (range) Usual management
      Nondiagnostic 13 (5–20) Repeat FNA with ultrasound guidance
      Benign 4 (2–7) Clinical and sonographic follow-up
      Atypia of undetermined significance 22 (13–30) Repeat FNA, molecular testing, diagnostic lobectomy, or surveillance
      Follicular neoplasm 30 (23–34) Molecular testing, diagnostic lobectomy
      Suspicious for malignancy 74 (67–83) Molecular testing, lobectomy, or near-total thyroidectomy
      Malignant 97 (97–100) Lobectomy or near-total thyroidectomy
      Diagnostic category ROM (%), mean (range) Usual management
      Nondiagnostic 14 (0–33) Repeat FNA with ultrasound guidance
      Benign 6 (0–27) Clinical and sonographic follow-up
      Atypia of undetermined significance 28 (11–54) Repeat FNA or surgical resection
      Follicular neoplasm 50 (28–100) Surgical resection
      Suspicious for malignancy 81 (40–100) Surgical resection
      Malignant 98 (86–100) Surgical resection
      Diagnostic category ROM (%)a, mean (range) Recommended clinical management
      Unsatisfactory 4.5 (3.7–9.9) Repeat FNA or follow-up for benign ultrasound findings
      Cyst fluid 0.4 (0.1–2.9) Follow-up or repeat FNA for malignant ultrasound findings
      Benign 0.7 (0.4–1.2)
      Undetermined significance 16.7 (11.6–28.4) Repeat FNA or follow-up based on ultrasound findings or ancillary study
      Follicular neoplasm 11.4 (8.9–17.0) Resection or follow-up based on other clinical findings
      Suspicious for malignancy 94.2 (82.7–100) Resection or active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
      Malignant 99.6 (99.1–99.8)
      Contraindications Presence of clinical node metastasis and/or clinical distant metastasis at diagnosis
      Signs or symptoms of invasion to the recurrent laryngeal nerve or trachea
      Aggressive papillary thyroid carcinomas (tall cell and columnar cell subtypes) and high-grade follicular-derived carcinomas (poorly differentiated carcinoma and differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinoma) identified on cytology
      Unsuitability Tumors attaching to the trachea on imaging
      Tumors located in the pathway of the recurrent laryngeal nerve on imaging
      Advantages Reduction of inadequate specimens
      Higher cell collection rates
      Fewer fields of view
      Disappearance of red blood cells and colloids
      Excellent preservation of cell morphology
      Presence of unique diagnostic clues
      Avoiding sample degeneration by smearing
      Capable of preparing several samples for immunocytochemistry
      Disadvantages More complicated preparation methods
      High cost
      Cytological findings different from those of direct smears
      Obscure diagnostic clues observed on direct smears
      Common finding
       Blood components Hemolysis and disappearance of red blood cells, fibrin precipitation
       Colloid Dissolution and disappearance of watery colloids
       Lymphocytes Tendency to clump together
       Cell Smaller in size (shrinkage rate: cytoplasm > nuclei, benign cells > carcinoma cells)
       Cytoplasm Smaller in size, more intensely stained
       Nuclei More darkly stained, smaller in size
       Nucleoli More eosinophilic, more conspicuous
      Disease-specific findings
       Follicular nodular disease Distinct cell membrane, preserved basement membrane
       Follicular neoplasm Fibrin surrounding microfollicular clusters, no intercellular windows
       Hyalinizing trabecular tumor Highlighted yellow bodies
       Papillary thyroid carcinoma Convoluted nuclei, intercellular windows, distinct tall columnar cells, no overlapping nuclei, indistinct ground glass nuclei
       Medullary thyroid carcinoma Well-defined tail-like cytoplasm
       Lymphoma Disappearance of lymphoglandular bodies, enlarged nuclei, meshed chromatin pattern, prominent and elongated nuclei
      Tumor type Positive antibodies Negative antibodies
      Follicular cell-derived tumors PAX8, TTF-1, thyroglobulin GATA-3, calcitonin, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD5
      Hyalinizing trabecular tumor MIB-1 (cell membranous), type IV collagen (intercellular) Cytokeratin 19, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, HBME-1
      Medullary thyroid carcinoma Calcitonin, CEA, chromogranin A, synaptophysin PAX8, TTF-1, thyroglobulin
      Intrathyroid thymic carcinoma CD5, p63, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, CD117 PAX8, TTF-1, thyroglobulin
      Parathyroid adenoma GATA-3, chromogranin A, PTH, parafibromin PAX8, TTF-1, thyroglobulin, parafibromin (CDC73 gene mutation)
      Cribriform morular carcinoma Beta-catenin (nuclear and cell membranous), estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, CD5 (morules), adipophilin (subnuclear) Thyroglobulin
      Renal cell carcinoma CD10, PAX8 TTF-1, thyroglobulin
      Pulmonary carcinoma TTF-1, napsin A PAX8, thyroglobulin
      Table 1. Main revisions in the third edition of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology [6]

      AUS, atypia of undetermined significance; FLUS, follicular lesion of undetermined significance; FN, follicular neoplasm; SFN, suspicious for follicular neoplasm; WHO, World Health Organization.

      Table 2. ROM and usual management for adult patients in The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology

      Adapted from Ali SZ and VanderLaan PA (2023). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: definition, criteria, and explanatory notes, with permission from Springer [6].

      ROM, risk of malignancy; FNA, fine-needle aspiration.

      Table 3. ROM and possible management recommendations for pediatric patients in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology

      Adapted from Ali SZ and VanderLaan PA (2023). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: definition, criteria, and explanatory notes, with permission from Springer [6].

      ROM, risk of malignancy; FNA, fine-needle aspiration.

      Table 4. ROM and recommended clinical management in the Japanese system for reporting thyroid cytopathology [17]

      ROM, risk of malignancy.

      Percentage of overall cases on unsatisfactory, cystic fluid, benign, undetermined significance, and follicular neoplasms, and that of resected cases on suspicious for malignancy and malignant.

      Table 5. Papillary thyroid microcarcinomas for which active surveillance is not recommended [18,19]

      Table 6. Advantages and disadvantages of liquid-based cytology compared with direct smears

      Table 7. Comparison of the cytological characteristics of liquid-based cytology specimens with those of direct smears

      Table 8. Immunocytochemical panels used for thyroid fine-needle aspiration

      PAX-8, paired box gene 8; TTF-1, thyroid transcription factor-1; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; PTH, parathyroid hormone.


      J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
      TOP