 , Mykola Lyndin
, Mykola Lyndin , Kateryna Sikora1
, Kateryna Sikora1 , Artem Piddubnyi
, Artem Piddubnyi , Ludmila Karpenko
, Ludmila Karpenko , Olha Kravtsova1
, Olha Kravtsova1 , Dmytrii Hyriavenko2
, Dmytrii Hyriavenko2 , Olena Diachenko2
, Olena Diachenko2 , Vladyslav Sikora
, Vladyslav Sikora , Anatolii Romaniuk
, Anatolii Romaniuk 
			Department of Pathology, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
1Sumy Regional Clinical Perinatal Center, Sumy, Ukraine
2Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
© 2019 The Korean Society of Pathologists/The Korean Society for Cytopathology
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: NH, ML, VS, AR.
Data curation: NH, ML, KS, AP, LK, VS, OK.
Formal analysis: NH, DH, OD.
Investigation: NH, ML, KS, AP, LK, OK, VS, DH, OD.
Methodology: NH, ML, KS, AR, VS.
Project administration: NH, ML, VS, AR.
Resources: OK, KS, AR.
Software: AP, LK, DH.
Supervision: AR.
Validation: NH, ML, KS, AP, LK, OK, VS.
Visualization: NH, KS, AP, LK, OK .
Writing—original draft: NH, ML, KS, AP, LK, OK, OD, VS.
Writing—review & editing: NH, ML, AR.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.
 
 
 
| Average index of proliferation (%) | No. of female patients with SAcFT (%) | 
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 
| 0–30 | 12 (18.2) | 
| 30–60 | 18 (27.3) | 
| > 60 | 36 (54.5) | 
 PubReader
 PubReader ePub Link
ePub Link Cite this Article
Cite this Article	
					 XML Download
XML Download 
											 
											 
									| Antibody | Immunized animal | Clone | Dilution | Pattern | Evaluation features | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | Rabbit | SP1 | 1:200 | Nucleus | According to the recommendations of D.C. Allred and taking into account the proportion of colored nuclei and the intensity of their staining | 
| PR | Rabbit | YR85 | 1:150 | Nucleus | |
| HER2/neu | Rabbit | SP3 | 1:100 | Membrane | In points (from 0 to 3), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and taking into account the completeness and intensity of membrane staining | 
| Ki-67 | Rabbit | SP6 | 1:100 | Nucleus | 0 point: negative reaction | 
| 1 point: weakly positive reaction (n = 0%–30%) | |||||
| 2 points: moderately positive reaction (30% < n < 60%) | |||||
| 3 points: strong positive reaction (n > 60%) | |||||
| p53 | Mouse | SP5 | 1:100 | Nucleus | Weak reaction (10–25% of positively stained tumor cells), moderate positive | 
| Bcl-2 | Mouse | 100/D5 | 1:100 | Cytoplasm | Weak expression (1+): weak cytoplasmic staining of more than 10% of tumor cells | 
| Moderate (2+): staining of average intensity more than 10% | |||||
| Strong (3+): intense staining of more than 10% of tumor cells | |||||
| VEGF | Rabbit | Polyclon | 1:200 | Cytoplasm and membrane | 0 points: absence of cytoplasmic expression | 
| 1 point: weak cytoplasmic staining less than 10% of cells | |||||
| 2 points: weak or moderate expression in 10%–50% of cells | |||||
| 3 points: strong or moderate expression in more than 50% of cells | 
| Stage | No. of patients with PCFT (%) | 
|---|---|
| 0 | - | 
| I | 24 (33.8) | 
| IA–T1aN0M0 | 5 (7.0) | 
| IB–T1bN0M0 | 8 (11.3) | 
| IC–11cN0M0 | 11 (15.5) | 
| II | 19 (26.8) | 
| IIA–T2aN0M0 | 10 (14.1) | 
| IIB–T2bN0M0 | 3 (4.2) | 
| IIC–T2cN0M0 | 6 (8.5) | 
| III | 28 (39.4) | 
| IIIA–T3aN0 M0 | 2 (2.8) | 
| IIIB–T3bN0 M0 | 5 (7.0) | 
| IIIC–T3c N0M0 | 2 (2.8) | 
| IIIC–T1-3N1M0 | 19 (26.8) | 
| IV–T1-3N0-1M1 | - | 
| Total | 71 (100) | 
| Average index of proliferation (%) | No. of female patients with SAcFT (%) | 
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 
| 0–30 | 12 (18.2) | 
| 30–60 | 18 (27.3) | 
| > 60 | 36 (54.5) | 
| Evaluation’s criteria | Average No. of p53 (%) | 
|---|---|
| Disease stage according to FIGO classification | |
| I | 10.5 ± 2.2 | 
| II | 46.8 ± 5.2 | 
| III | 71.7 ± 3.9 | 
| Presence of lesion in regional lymph nodes | |
| N0 | 29.7 ± 3.6 | 
| N1 | 80.6 ± 2.7 | 
| Degree of tumor differentiation | |
| G1 | 5.6 ± 2.4 | 
| G2 | 35.6 ± 6.2 | 
| G3 | 62.2 ± 4.2 | 
| Evaluation’s criteria | No. of Bcl-2–positive tumor cases | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1+ | 2+ | 3+ | |
| Disease stage according to FIGO classification | ||||
| I (n = 23) | - | 1 | 4 | 18 | 
| II (n = 16) | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 
| III (n = 27) | 8 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 
| The presence of lesion in regional lymph nodes | ||||
| N0 (n = 47) | 2 | 5 | 12 | 28 | 
| N1 (n = 19) | 9 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 
| Degree of tumor differentiation | ||||
| G1 (n = 10) | - | - | - | 100 | 
| G2 (n = 23) | 3 | - | 5 | 15 | 
| G3 (n = 33) | 8 | 7 | 13 | 5 | 
						 ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
						 PCFT, primary cancer of the fallopian tubes; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
						 SAcFT, serous adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tubes.
						 SAcFT, serous adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tubes; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
						 SAcFT, serous adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tubes; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.