Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

Original Article

Comparison of Unsatisfactory Samples from Conventional Smear versus Liquid-Based Cytology in Uterine Cervical Cancer Screening Test: Hoiseon Jeong, Sung Ran Hong, Seoung-Wan Chae, So-Young Jin, Hye Kyoung Yoon, Juhie Lee, Eun Kyung Kim, Sook Tai Ha, Sung Nam Kim, Eun-Jung Park, Jong Jae Jung, Sun Hee Sung, Sung-chul Lim; J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51(3):314-319. Published online April 17, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2017.03.17

10,132 View
299 Download
16 Web of Science
17 Crossref

Background
Cervical cytology for uterine cervical cancer screening has transitioned from conventional smear (CS) to liquid-based cytology (LBC), which has many advantages. The aim of this study was to compare the proportion of unsatisfactory specimens from CS versus LBC at multiple institutions including general hospitals and commercial laboratories.
Methods
Each participating institution provided a minimum of 500 Papanicolaou (Pap) test results for analysis. Pap tests were classified according to the participating institution (commercial laboratory or general hospital) and the processing method (CS, ThinPrep, SurePath, or CellPrep). The causes of unsatisfactory results were classified as technical problems, scant cellularity, or complete obscuring factors.
Results
A total of 38,956 Pap test results from eight general hospitals and three commercial laboratories were analyzed. The mean unsatisfactory rate of LBC was significantly lower than that of CS (1.26% and 3.31%, p = .018). In the LBC method, samples from general hospitals had lower unsatisfactory rates than those from commercial laboratories (0.65% vs 2.89%, p = .006). The reasons for unsatisfactory results were heterogeneous in CS. On the other hand, 66.2% of unsatisfactory results in LBC were due to the scant cellularity.
Conclusions
Unsatisfactory rate of cervical cancer screening test results varies according to the institution and the processing method. LBC has a significantly lower unsatisfactory rate than CS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The possibilities of adapting the re-processing protocol in the practice of the ThinPrep Pap test usage
Artem K. Aksamentov, Nadezhda V. Melnikova, Eugenia V. Moshnina, Nadezhda A. Kolyshkina, Olga N. Kucherova, Vladimir P. Baklaushev
Journal of Clinical Practice.2023; 14(1): 108. CrossRef
The Role of p16/Ki67 Dual Staining in Cervical Cancer Screening
Andraž Dovnik, Alenka Repše Fokter
Current Issues in Molecular Biology.2023; 45(10): 8476. CrossRef
Evaluation of a Novel Fixative Solution for Liquid-Based Cytology in Diagnostic Cytopathology
Nadia Casatta, Alessia Poli, Sara Bassani, Gianna Veronesi, Giulio Rossi, Clarissa Ferrari, Carmelo Lupo
Diagnostics.2023; 13(24): 3601. CrossRef
Liquid-Based cytology in the detection of premalignant lesions in patients with “atypia in squamous cells” in conventional cytology
Lia Barrios, Yoled Vizcaíno, Ines Benedetti
Journal of Cytology.2022; 39(4): 148. CrossRef
Meeting the challenges of cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination in the UK
Roxanne Westwood, Joanna Lavery
Primary Health Care.2022; 32(01): 22. CrossRef
Method for preservation of DNA stability of liquid-based cytology specimens from a lung adenocarcinoma cell line
Yukiko Matsuo, Kazuya Yamashita, Tsutomu Yoshida, Yukitoshi Satoh
Virchows Archiv.2021; 478(3): 507. CrossRef
High-risk human papillomavirus test in anal smears: can it optimize the screening for anal cancer?
Cintia M.S. Kimura, Caio S.R. Nahas, Edésio V. Silva-Filho, Vinícius L. Ribeiro, Aluisio C. Segurado, Flávio F.P. Alcântara, Ivan Cecconello, Sergio C. Nahas
AIDS.2021; 35(5): 737. CrossRef
Automatic model for cervical cancer screening based on convolutional neural network: a retrospective, multicohort, multicenter study
Xiangyu Tan, Kexin Li, Jiucheng Zhang, Wenzhe Wang, Bian Wu, Jian Wu, Xiaoping Li, Xiaoyuan Huang
Cancer Cell International.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
The cytological component of cervical cancer screening: causes of false negative and false positive results, and ways to avoid them
O.A. Burka, N.F. Lygyrda, V.V. Kutsovol, A.V. Svintsitska
REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY.2021; (57): 61. CrossRef
Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional smear cytology for EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective randomized noninferiority study
Jung Won Chun, Kyoungbun Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Haeryoung Kim, Min Su You, Yoon Jung Hwang, Woo Hyun Paik, Ji Kon Ryu, Yong-Tae Kim
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(4): 837. CrossRef
Effective reduction in inadequate Pap smears by using a saline-lubricated speculum and two glass slides
Chi-Jui Chen, Mun-Kun Hong, Dah-Ching Ding
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2020; 59(6): 906. CrossRef
Characterizing the Effect of Automated Cell Sorting Solutions on Cytomorphological Changes
Katsuhide Ikeda, Shouichi Sato, Hiroshi Chigira, Yasuo Shibuki, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka
Acta Cytologica.2020; 64(3): 232. CrossRef
Comparison between Conventional Cytology and Liquid-Based Cytology in the Tertiary Brazilian Navy Hospital in Rio de Janeiro
Antônio Carlos Almeida de Oliveira, Miguel Fontes Domingues, Paulo Murilo Neufeld, Marcos Fleury, José Firmino Nogueira Neto
Acta Cytologica.2020; 64(6): 539. CrossRef
Follow‐up with histopathology and HPV testing on LSIL cytology in China’s largest academic woman’s hospital
Xiang Tao, Huina Zhang, Hao Zhang, Jianan Xiao, Juan Li, Xianrong Zhou, Li Wang, Chengquan Zhao
Cancer Cytopathology.2019; 127(4): 258. CrossRef
Current Status of and Perspectives on Cervical Cancer Screening in Korea
Sung-Chul Lim, Chong Woo Yoo
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2019; 53(4): 210. CrossRef
Reducing DNA damage by formaldehyde in liquid‐based cytology preservation solutions to enable the molecular testing of lung cancer specimens
Yukiko Matsuo, Tsutomu Yoshida, Kazuya Yamashita, Yukitoshi Satoh
Cancer Cytopathology.2018; 126(12): 1011. CrossRef
Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Europe: The Transition Towards HPV Vaccination and Population-Based HPV Testing
Andreas Chrysostomou, Dora Stylianou, Anastasia Constantinidou, Leondios Kostrikis
Viruses.2018; 10(12): 729. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search