Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Nodular hyperplasia"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Newly Formed Hepatic Masses in Children with Biliary Atresia after Kasai Hepatic Portoenterostomy.
Hye Jong Song, Yeon Lim Suh
Korean J Pathol. 2011;45(2):160-169.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2011.45.2.160
  • 4,173 View
  • 30 Download
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
BACKGROUND
This report describes the clinicopathologic findings of six hepatic masses that developed after Kasai hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE) in six patients with longstanding biliary atresia (BA).
METHODS
Hepatic masses were found in six of 55 pediatric patients who underwent liver transplantation for BA after Kasai HPE from 1997 to 2009. Clinicopathologic analysis was performed and immunohistochemical staining was carried out for CD34, smooth muscle actin (SMA) and cytokeratin 7.
RESULTS
Of the six hepatic masses, two were diagnosed as focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)-like lesions, two were large regenerative nodules (LRN), one was a mesenchymal hamartoma (MH) and one was a cholangiocarcinoma. The immunohistochemical staining findings for SMA and CD34 were more prominent for the FNH-like nodules than for the cirrhotic background liver. Dysplastic biliary epithelium arising from intestinal metaplasia was found in the cholangiocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that FNH-like lesions, LRNs and MH are the results of vascular hemodynamic changes after Kasai HPE and that cholangiocarcinoma is due to recurrent cholangitis after BA. All the lesions in this series must be included in the differential diagnosis of a newly formed hepatic mass in patients after portoenterostomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Imaging Findings and Management Strategies for Liver Masses in Children with Predisposition Disorders: A Review by the Pediatric LI-RADS Group
    Amy B. Kolbe, Michael R. Acord, Geetika Khanna, Cara E. Morin, HaiThuy N. Nguyen, Mitchell A. Rees, Esther Ro, Gary R. Schooler, Judy H. Squires, Ali B. Syed, Elizabeth R. Tang, Alexander J. Towbin, Adina Alazraki
    RadioGraphics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Features of Nodules in Explants of Children Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Biliary Atresia
    Ana M. Calinescu, Anne-Laure Rougemont, Mehrak Anooshiravani, Nathalie M. Rock, Valerie A. McLin, Barbara E. Wildhaber
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(6): 1578.     CrossRef
  • Biliary Atresia Patients With Successful Kasai Portoenterostomy Can Present With Features of Obliterative Portal Venopathy
    Kalyani R. Patel, Sanjiv Harpavat, Zahida Khan, Sadhna Dhingra, Norma Quintanilla, Mihail Firan, John Goss
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2020; 71(1): 91.     CrossRef
Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Transurethral Resection Specimens On serum PSA and histologic findings.
Joon Mee Kim, Soo Kee Min, Young Chae Chu, Tae Sook Hwang, Young Bae Kim, Jee Young Han, Tae Sook Kim, Hye Seung Han
Korean J Pathol. 2000;34(5):349-357.
  • 1,781 View
  • 14 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), which is divided into low and high grade, has different clinicopathologic significance. We reviewed 158 prostatic tissues, which consisted of 144 cases of nodular hyperplasias and 14 cases of adenocarcinomas, to evaluate incidence of PIN, its histologic finding, and its clinical significance. Ten cases of PIN, 4 low grade and 6 high grade, were found. Four cases of low grade PIN (LPIN) and five cases of high grade PIN (HPIN) were associated with nodular hyperplasia. Only one case of HPIN occurred in carcinoma. The constant histologic findings of LPIN were nuclear stratification and nucleomegaly. The most prominent characteristics of HPIN were hyperchromasia and prominent nucleoli. Anisonucleosis was not so helpful for differential diagnosis between LPIN and HPIN. Basal layer disruption was present in one case of high grade PIN associated with adenocarcinoma, and important for the differentiatial diagnosis of cribriform HPIN from the cribriform adenocarcinoma. There was no significant difference in age incidence between the two groups with the mean age of 70.9 years in nodular hyperplasia and 69.4 years in adenocarcinoma. Serum PSA level was significantly different between the two group with the mean PSA value of 11.03 ng/ml in nodular hyperplasia and that of 73.76 ng/ml in carcinoma (p=0.000). However, PSA values between "nodular hyperplasia only" group and "PIN associated nodular hyperplasia" group were not significantly different. PIN association changed neither age distribution nor serum PSA level. During the follow up period, no adenocacinoma has occurred in the cases having PIN although serum PSA level has elevated in some cases. One case of adenocarcinoma associated with HPIN developed in the nodular hyperplasia patient. Although PIN did not increase the possibility of subsequent prostatic adenocarcinoma in transurethral resection specimens, it could not be excluded that PIN was a precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma.

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
TOP