PublisherDOIYearVolumeIssuePageTitleAuthor(s)Link
Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine10.4132/jptm.2017.03.172017513314-319Comparison of Unsatisfactory Samples from Conventional Smear versus Liquid-Based Cytology in Uterine Cervical Cancer Screening TestHoiseon Jeong, Sung Ran Hong, Seoung-Wan Chae, So-Young Jin, Hye Kyoung Yoon, Juhie Lee, Eun Kyung Kim, Sook Tai Ha, Sung Nam Kim, Eun-Jung Park, Jong Jae Jung, Sun Hee Sung, Sung-chul Limhttp://www.jpatholtm.org/upload/pdf/jptm-2017-03-17.pdf, http://www.jpatholtm.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.4132/jptm.2017.03.17, http://www.jpatholtm.org/upload/pdf/jptm-2017-03-17.pdf
Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology10.3126/njog.v14i2.28435201914222-25Cervical cancer screening by conventional Pap smear versus liquid based cytologySubi Basnyat, Gehanath Baral, Karishma Mallahttps://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NJOG/article/download/28435/23466, https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NJOG/article/download/28435/23466
Cancer10.1002/cncr.2024020041023200-200Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smearsMyron R. Melamedhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fcncr.20240, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cncr.20240
Cancer10.1002/cncr.2295320071115285-291Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening programBjörn Strander, Agneta Andersson-Ellström, Ian Milsom, Thomas Rådberg, Walter Rydhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fcncr.22953
Gynecologic Oncology10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.01220091123572-576Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening programH. Beerman, E.B.L. van Dorst, V. Kuenen-Boumeester, P.C.W. Hogendoornhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0090825808010603?httpAccept=text/xml, https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0090825808010603?httpAccept=text/plain
Diagnostic Cytopathology10.1002/dc.234472016445363-368Direct comparison of liquid-based and smear-based cytology with and without rapid on-site evaluation for fine needle aspirates of thoracic tumorsA. Mfokazi, C.A. Wright, M. Louw, F. Von Groote-Bidlingmaier, P. T. Schubert, C. F. N. Koegelenberg, A. H. Diaconhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fdc.23447, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/dc.23447
The Lancet10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69000-420063689530118Liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytologyAmanda Herberthttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0140673606690004?httpAccept=text/xml, https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0140673606690004?httpAccept=text/plain
Cytopathology10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00464.x2007183133-139European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology*M. Arbyn, A. Herbert, U. Schenck, P. Nieminen, J. Jordan, E. Mcgoogan, J. Patnick, C. Bergeron, J-J. Baldauf, P. Klinkhamer, J. Bulten, P. Martin-Hirschhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2303.2007.00464.x
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02650.x201011791067-1073Age-specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid-based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trialsPE Castle, J Bulten, M Confortini, P Klinkhamer, A Pellegrini, AG Siebers, G Ronco, M Arbynhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2010.02650.x
Cytopathology10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00384.x2006174187-194Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePathR liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancerB. Kirschner, K. Simonsen, J. Jungehttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2303.2006.00384.x