Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Reproducibility"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Interobserver Reproducibility of PD-L1 Biomarker in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study by 27 Pathologists
Sunhee Chang, Hyung Kyu Park, Yoon-La Choi, Se Jin Jang
J Pathol Transl Med. 2019;53(6):347-353.   Published online October 28, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.09.29
  • 5,348 View
  • 196 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 24 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Assessment of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical staining is used for treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regarding use of PD-L1/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy. The reliability of the PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx assay is critical in guiding clinical practice. The Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists investigated the interobserver reproducibility of PD-L1 staining with 22C3 pharmDx in NSCLC samples.
Methods
Twenty-seven pathologists individually assessed the tumor proportion score (TPS) for 107 NSCLC samples. Each case was divided into three levels based on TPS: <1%, 1%–49%, and ≥50%.
Results
The intraclass correlation coefficient for TPS was 0.902±0.058. Weighted κ coefficient for 3-step assessment was 0.748±0.093. The κ coefficients for 1% and 50% cut-offs were 0.633 and 0.834, respectively. There was a significant association between interobserver reproducibility and experience (formal PD-L1 training, more experience for PD-L1 assessment, and longer practice duration on surgical pathology), histologic subtype, and specimen type.
Conclusions
Our results indicate that PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining provides a reproducible basis for decisions on anti–PD-1 therapy in NSCLC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Predicts Immunotherapy Response in Solid Tumors Based on PD-L1 Expression
    Marta Ligero, Garazi Serna, Omar S.M. El Nahhas, Irene Sansano, Siarhei Mauchanski, Cristina Viaplana, Julien Calderaro, Rodrigo A. Toledo, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Rami S. Vanguri, Jennifer L. Sauter, Francisco Sanchez-Vega, Sohrab P. Shah, Santiago Ramón y C
    Cancer Research Communications.2024; 4(1): 92.     CrossRef
  • Concordance of assessments of four PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
    Xinran Wang, Jiankun He, Jinze Li, Chun Wu, Meng Yue, Shuyao Niu, Ying Jia, Zhanli Jia, Lijing Cai, Yueping Liu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deep learning-based assay for programmed death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry scoring in non-small cell lung carcinoma: Does it help pathologists score?
    Hiroaki Ito, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Kazuhiro Terada, Akiyoshi Nakakura, Mariyo Rokutan-Kurata, Tatsuhiko Sugimoto, Kazuya Nishimura, Naoki Nakajima, Shinji Sumiyoshi, Masatsugu Hamaji, Toshi Menju, Hiroshi Date, Satoshi Morita, Ryoma Bise, Hironori Haga
    Modern Pathology.2024; : 100485.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Prolonged Ischemia on the Immunohistochemical Expression of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1)
    Angels Barberà, Juan González, Montserrat Martin, Jose L. Mate, Albert Oriol, Fina Martínez-Soler, Tomas Santalucia, Pedro Luis Fernández
    Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.2023; 31(9): 607.     CrossRef
  • A practical approach for PD-L1 evaluation in gastroesophageal cancer
    Valentina Angerilli, Matteo Fassan, Paola Parente, Irene Gullo, Michela Campora, Chiara Rossi, Maria Luisa Sacramento, Gianmaria Pennelli, Alessandro Vanoli, Federica Grillo, Luca Mastracci
    Pathologica.2023; 115(2): 57.     CrossRef
  • EZH2 and POU2F3 Can Aid in the Distinction of Thymic Carcinoma from Thymoma
    Julia R. Naso, Julie A. Vrana, Justin W. Koepplin, Julian R. Molina, Anja C. Roden
    Cancers.2023; 15(8): 2274.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence-assisted system for precision diagnosis of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer
    Jianghua Wu, Changling Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Wei Sun, Linfeng Li, Nannan Gao, Yajun Zhang, Xin Yang, Junjie Zhang, Haiyue Wang, Xinying Liu, Xiaozheng Huang, Yanhui Zhang, Runfen Cheng, Kaiwen Chi, Luning Mao, Lixin Zhou, Dongmei Lin, Shaoping Ling
    Modern Pathology.2022; 35(3): 403.     CrossRef
  • Immunohistochemistry as predictive and prognostic markers for gastrointestinal malignancies
    Matthew W. Rosenbaum, Raul S. Gonzalez
    Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology.2022; 39(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • Gastric Cancer: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Approaches
    Sangjoon Choi, Sujin Park, Hyunjin Kim, So Young Kang, Soomin Ahn, Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(3): 543.     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a supervised deep learning algorithm for automated whole‐slide programmed death‐ligand 1 tumour proportion score assessment in non‐small cell lung cancer
    Liesbeth M Hondelink, Melek Hüyük, Pieter E Postmus, Vincent T H B M Smit, Sami Blom, Jan H von der Thüsen, Danielle Cohen
    Histopathology.2022; 80(4): 635.     CrossRef
  • 5-hmC loss is another useful tool in addition to BAP1 and MTAP immunostains to distinguish diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia in peritoneal cytology cell-blocks and biopsies
    Ziyad Alsugair, Vahan Kepenekian, Tanguy Fenouil, Olivier Glehen, Laurent Villeneuve, Sylvie Isaac, Juliette Hommell-Fontaine, Nazim Benzerdjeb
    Virchows Archiv.2022; 481(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence–powered programmed death ligand 1 analyser reduces interobserver variation in tumour proportion score for non–small cell lung cancer with better prediction of immunotherapy response
    Sangjoon Choi, Soo Ick Cho, Minuk Ma, Seonwook Park, Sergio Pereira, Brian Jaehong Aum, Seunghwan Shin, Kyunghyun Paeng, Donggeun Yoo, Wonkyung Jung, Chan-Young Ock, Se-Hoon Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Jin-Haeng Chung, Tony S. Mok, Hyojin Kim, Seokhwi Kim
    European Journal of Cancer.2022; 170: 17.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Score Analysis for Predicting the Expression of the Immunotherapy Biomarker PD-L1 in Lung Cancer
    Guoping Cheng, Fuchuang Zhang, Yishi Xing, Xingyi Hu, He Zhang, Shiting Chen, Mengdao Li, Chaolong Peng, Guangtai Ding, Dadong Zhang, Peilin Chen, Qingxin Xia, Meijuan Wu
    Frontiers in Immunology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of artificial intelligence-powered and manual quantification of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression with outcomes in patients treated with nivolumab ± ipilimumab
    Vipul Baxi, George Lee, Chunzhe Duan, Dimple Pandya, Daniel N. Cohen, Robin Edwards, Han Chang, Jun Li, Hunter Elliott, Harsha Pokkalla, Benjamin Glass, Nishant Agrawal, Abhik Lahiri, Dayong Wang, Aditya Khosla, Ilan Wapinski, Andrew Beck, Michael Montalt
    Modern Pathology.2022; 35(11): 1529.     CrossRef
  • High interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility among pathologists assessing PD‐L1 CPS across multiple indications
    Shanthy Nuti, Yiwei Zhang, Nabila Zerrouki, Charlotte Roach, Gudrun Bänfer, George L Kumar, Edward Manna, Rolf Diezko, Kristopher Kersch, Josef Rüschoff, Bharat Jasani
    Histopathology.2022; 81(6): 732.     CrossRef
  • Modifying factors of PD‐L1 expression on tumor cells in advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer
    Alejandro Avilés‐Salas, Diana Flores‐Estrada, Luis Lara‐Mejía, Rodrigo Catalán, Graciela Cruz‐Rico, Mario Orozco‐Morales, David Heredia, Laura Bolaño‐Guerra, Pamela Denisse Soberanis‐Piña, Edgar Varela‐Santoyo, Andrés F. Cardona, Oscar Arrieta
    Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(23): 3362.     CrossRef
  • Comparability of laboratory-developed and commercial PD-L1 assays in non-small cell lung carcinoma
    Julia R. Naso, Gang Wang, Norbert Banyi, Fatemeh Derakhshan, Aria Shokoohi, Cheryl Ho, Chen Zhou, Diana N. Ionescu
    Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2021; 50: 151590.     CrossRef
  • Interobserver agreement in programmed cell death‐ligand 1 immunohistochemistry scoring in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma cytologic specimens
    William Sinclair, Peter Kobalka, Rongqin Ren, Boulos Beshai, Abberly A. Lott Limbach, Lai Wei, Ping Mei, Zaibo Li
    Diagnostic Cytopathology.2021; 49(2): 219.     CrossRef
  • Automated PD-L1 Scoring for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Using Open-Source Software
    Julia R. Naso, Tetiana Povshedna, Gang Wang, Norbert Banyi, Calum MacAulay, Diana N. Ionescu, Chen Zhou
    Pathology and Oncology Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Immunohistochemical Expression of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Is Affected by Sample Overfixation
    Angels Barberà, Ruth Marginet Flinch, Montserrat Martin, Jose L. Mate, Albert Oriol, Fina Martínez-Soler, Tomas Santalucia, Pedro L. Fernández
    Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.2021; 29(1): 76.     CrossRef
  • Programmed cell death-ligand 1 assessment in urothelial carcinoma: prospect and limitation
    Kyu Sang Lee, Gheeyoung Choe
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2021; 55(3): 163.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Semi-Quantitative Scoring and Artificial Intelligence Aided Digital Image Analysis of Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry
    János Bencze, Máté Szarka, Balázs Kóti, Woosung Seo, Tibor G. Hortobágyi, Viktor Bencs, László V. Módis, Tibor Hortobágyi
    Biomolecules.2021; 12(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • Immunization against ROS1 by DNA Electroporation Impairs K-Ras-Driven Lung Adenocarcinomas
    Federica Riccardo, Giuseppina Barutello, Angela Petito, Lidia Tarone, Laura Conti, Maddalena Arigoni, Chiara Musiu, Stefania Izzo, Marco Volante, Dario Livio Longo, Irene Fiore Merighi, Mauro Papotti, Federica Cavallo, Elena Quaglino
    Vaccines.2020; 8(2): 166.     CrossRef
  • Utility of PD-L1 testing on non-small cell lung cancer cytology specimens: An institutional experience with interobserver variability analysis
    Oleksandr Kravtsov, Christopher P. Hartley, Yuri Sheinin, Bryan C. Hunt, Juan C. Felix, Tamara Giorgadze
    Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2020; 48: 151602.     CrossRef
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Comparison of Histologic Classifications and Correlation with Histologic Grade of Coexisting Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Sung Ran Hong, Yee Jeong Kim, Yi Kyeong Chun, Hye Sun Kim, Hy Sook Kim
Korean J Pathol. 1999;33(6):434-442.
  • 1,878 View
  • 29 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Recently developed new classifications (Holland, Van Nuys, modified Lagios) of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) linked to outcome have emphasized the importance of nuclear morphology rather than architecture. We have evaluated these three classifications in ductal carcinomas composed of in situ and invasive carcinomas. The reproducibility of three classifications was assessed (n=49), and the histological grade of the DCIS was compared with the histologic differentiation (modified Bloom & Richardson method) and nuclear grade (modified Black method) of the coexisting invasive ductal carcinoma (n=45). According to Holland classification, the DCIS component was poorly differentiated in 51.0%, intermediately differentiated in 40.8%, and well differentiated in 8.2%. Using the Van Nuys classification, the DCIS component was group 3 (high grade with or without necrosis) in 44.9%, group 2 (non-high grade with necrosis) in 28.6%, and group 1 (non-high grade without necrosis) in 26.5%. According to the modified Lagios classification, the DCIS component was high-grade in 42.8%, intermediate-grade in 32.7%, and low-grade in 24.5%. The histologic grades of the three classifications revealed significant correlations between Holland and Van Nuys classification (p<0.0001) and between Holland and modified Lagios classification (p<0.0001), especially in poorly differentiated/group 3/high-grade DCIS. The reproducibility of classification of the DCIS was 71.4% in the Holland, 61.2% in the Van Nuys, and 55.1% in the modified Lagios classifications. The grade of the DCIS showed significant correlation with the grade of coexisting invasive ductal carcinoma (p<0.0001), especially in poorly differentiated/group 3/high-grade DCIS. In conclusion, DCIS grade, determined by the Holland, Van Nuys or modified Lagios classifications, is closely correlated with the histologic grade of the invasive ductal component in tumors composed of in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma, and may be a useful factor to estimate clinical behavior of DCIS. In our experience the Holland classification is recommended for DCIS classification due to its high reproducibility.

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine