E-submission
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Original Article
- Does Polymerase Chain Reaction of Tissue Specimens Aid in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis?
- Yoo Jin Lee, Seojin Kim, Youngjin Kang, Jiyoon Jung, Eunjung Lee, Joo-Young Kim, Jeong Hyeon Lee, Youngseok Lee, Yang-seok Chae, Chul Hwan Kim
- J Pathol Transl Med. 2016;50(6):451-458. Published online October 10, 2016
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2016.08.04
- 9,351 View
- 231 Download
- 5 Web of Science
- 7 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF - Background
Mycobacterial culture is the gold standard test for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB), but it is time-consuming. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a highly sensitive and specific method that can reduce the time required for diagnosis. The diagnostic efficacy of PCR differs, so this study determined the actual sensitivity of TB-PCR in tissue specimens.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 574 cases. The results of the nested PCR of the IS6110 gene, mycobacterial culture, TB-specific antigen-induced interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), acid-fast bacilli (AFB) staining, and histological findings were evaluated.
Results
The positivity rates were 17.6% for PCR, 3.3% for the AFB stain, 22.2% for mycobacterial culture, and 55.4% for IGRA. PCR had a low sensitivity (51.1%) and a high specificity (86.3%) based on the culture results of other studies. The sensitivity was higher (65.5%) in cases with necrotizing granuloma but showed the highest sensitivity (66.7%) in those with necrosis only. The concordance rate between the methods indicated that PCR was the best method compared to mycobacterial culture, and the concordance rate increased for the methods using positive result for PCR or histologic features.
Conclusions
PCR of tissue specimens is a good alternative to detect tuberculosis, but it may not be as sensitive as previously suggested. Its reliability may also be influenced by some histological features. Our data showed a higher sensitivity when specimens contained necrosis, which indicated that only specimens with necrosis should be used for PCR to detect tuberculosis. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
-
The Need for Persistence in the Diagnosis of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Mono-arthritis: A Unique Case Presentation
T. Bekoulis, P. Christodoulou, K. Dogramatzis, E. Markopoulou, Emmanouel Antonogiannakis, E. Kokkinakis, Alexandros P. Apostolopoulos, A. Manimanaki
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants.2024; 34(1): 35. CrossRef - Diagnostic Utility of Biplex/Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Infectious Granulomatous Dermatitis in North Indian Population
Mayur Parkhi, Mukin Kumar S, Dipankar De, Rakesh Yadav, Sunil Sethi, Bishan Dass Radotra, Uma Nahar Saikia
The American Journal of Dermatopathology.2021; 43(8): 567. CrossRef - Reduction of turnaround time for non-tuberculous mycobacteria detection in heater–cooler units by propidium monoazide–real-time polymerase chain reaction
S. Ditommaso, M. Giacomuzzi, G. Memoli, R. Cavallo, A. Curtoni, M. Avolio, C. Silvestre, C.M. Zotti
Journal of Hospital Infection.2020; 104(3): 365. CrossRef - Ergonomic Diagnostic Tool based on Chip Mini RT-PCR for Diagnosis of Pulmonary and Extra Pulmonary Tuberculosis
V Mangayarkarasi, Sneka P, Sujith R, Jayaprakash Jayaprakash
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology.2019; 13(2): 1185. CrossRef - Cutaneous Tuberculosis: Clinicopathologic Arrays and Diagnostic Challenges
Priyatam Khadka, Soniya Koirala, Januka Thapaliya
Dermatology Research and Practice.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef - Utility of Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction in DetectingMycobacterium tuberculosis
Zhongquan Lv, Mingxin Zhang, Hui Zhang, Xinxin Lu
BioMed Research International.2017; 2017: 1. CrossRef - Primary Appendicular Tuberculosis
Vipul D Yagnik
Gastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
-
The Need for Persistence in the Diagnosis of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Mono-arthritis: A Unique Case Presentation
First
Prev
